Research Report
College of Mass Communication, Box 391
Robert Wyatt, Director, (615) 898-2335,
rwyatt@mtsu.edu
Summary of Major Findings
Details on Major Findings Support strong for food tax cut offset by tax increase on large, medium businesses A convincing majority (68 percent) of Middle Tennesseans favors eliminating the sales tax on food as proposed by Gov. Don Sundquist. By a similar large majority (65 percent), they favor raising taxes on large business to pay for the cut, and a solid majority (54 percent) would also raise taxes on medium-sized businesses. However, less than one-third (27 percent) would increase taxes on small businesses to eliminate the sales tax on food. Women (73 percent) favored eliminating the food tax by an even larger majority than men do (63 percent). There was no difference among political or other demographic categories concerning support for raising taxes on big businesses. Majorities also supported raising taxes on medium businesses among the lowest (58 percent of those with families making $25,000 and under) and highest (66 percent of those making $40,000 and above) income groups but only 39 percent of those between $25-40,000 proved supportive. On support for taxing small businesses, education proved the best predictor, with about one-fifth (21 percent) of those with a high-school education or less supporting a raise, a figure edging up to 31 percent among those with some college or above. Support for a state lottery is about as high as for the proposed tax reforms. More than two-thirds (67 percent) also favor a state lottery, a figure that rises to 73 percent if the lottery proceeds go to education. However, only 40 percent would use a free lottery ticket as an incentive for people to vote. In general, support for a lottery is even higher among males (73 percent) than among females (63 percent). If lottery spending goes to education, age becomes an important predictor, with 85 percent of those age 18-34 and 72 percent of those 35-69 in favor, a figure that drops to just above a majority (52 percent) for those 65 and over. A good majority says the state is not spending enough on elementary and secondary schools (63 percent), the mentally retarded (57 percent), the environment (55 percent), and the handicapped (53 percent). The priority for elementary and secondary school spending is particularly strong among Middle Tennesseans age 18-49, where fully 71 percent say the state is spending too little. This age split is also important when environmental spending is assessed, with nearly two-thirds (63 percent) of those 18-49 believing there is too little spending, compared with only 39 percent of those 50 and up. Priorities for the mentally retarded and handicapped, interestingly, seem uniform among all age, gender, income, and political groups. Substantial pluralities also say the state is not spending enough on mental health (49 percent), foster care (46 percent), state universities and colleges (45 percent), TennCare (44 percent), mass transit (43 percent), law enforcement (41 percent), and community colleges and technical schools (40 percent). With mental health, those on the far left, liberals and middle-of-the-roaders are more likely to think spending was too light (55 percent) than conservatives or those on the far right (39 percent). Where foster care is concerned, those with family incomes between $15-25,000 seem most concerned about low spending (57 percent), a figure that drops to a straight majority for those making more. Among the poorest respondents making under $15,000, support, paradoxically, drops low, with only 36 percent regarding spending as too little With spending on colleges and universities, age again is an important indicator, with only 22 percent of those over 65 reporting the state spends too little, while for those 18-49, nearly a majority (49 percent) feels too little is spent. Where TennCare is concerned, the split occurs greatest between Republicans, only 31 percent of whom think the state spends too little, and Democrats, where the figure is 55 percent. For mass transit, support rises with income, reaching a high (59 percent) among those whose families make greater than $50,000. Far fewer feel that the state is not spending enough on highway maintenance (22 percent), welfare (22 percent), and new highway construction (15 percent). In fact, about half think that spending on highway maintenance (51 percent) and new construction (52 percent) are about right. Only one-third (33 percent) feel welfare spending is about right. These three items are the only spending issues where substantial numbers think the state is already spending too much. For example, 18 percent feel there is too much spending on highway maintenance; 33 percent feel spending is too high on welfare, and 24 percent feel new highway construction receives too much money. Number of years lived in Middle Tennessee is important in evaluating highway spending, with only 16 percent of those living here 18 years or less feeling spending is too little, compared with 26 percent who have resided in the area 19 years or more. Most respondents (79 percent) say the legislature should equalize the pay of urban and rural teachers. Meanwhile, almost half (49 percent) oppose charter schools. Charter schools have substantial support (73 percent) from parents who are satisfied with their children’s education, and non-parents (49 percent) who are not satisfied with the education Middle Tennessee children receive. If charter schools are to operate, most Middle Tennesseans (79 percent) say the schools’ teachers should be licensed. Respondents (57 percent) who do not have children of high school age or younger are more supportive of charter schools than are Middle Tennesseans (43 percent) with children in that age range. Lack of support for charter schools is substantially greater among those living outside Metro Nashville-Davidson County (74 percent) than those living inside Metro Nashville-Davidson County (26 percent). Blacks (9 percent) are vastly less supportive of charter schools than whites (90 percent). And Democrats (24 percent) and Independents (25 percent) are less supportive than Republicans (39 percent). Middle Tennesseans with household incomes of $25,000-$40,000 (26 percent) and more than $50,000 (36 percent) are most supportive of charter schools. Most Middle Tennesseans say Middle Tennessee schools are good, but private education institutions, both K-12 and higher education, were rated excellent more often than public education institutions. About 80 percent of Middle Tennesseans favor making seatbelt use mandatory. Seventeen percent oppose the idea, and about 2 percent don’t know. Fewer, but still a majority, (55 percent) like the idea of allowing police to pull over a car if the car’s driver or a passenger isn’t wearing a seatbelt. Forty-one percent oppose allowing police to do so, and another 4 percent don’t know. Both measures have significantly more support among women than among men. Eighty-seven percent of women in Middle Tennessee favor a mandatory seatbelt use law compared to 78 percent of men. Similarly, 69 percent of women say police should be able to stop a car if its driver or a passenger isn’t buckled up, but only 44 percent of men favor the idea. Thumbs up on graduated driver’s licenses and tougher drunk driving laws Sixty-two percent of Middle Tennesseans like the idea of giving teens "graduated" driver’s licenses. A graduated driver’s license is a license that limits driving privileges until one gets older and passes more tests. One-third (33 percent) oppose the idea, and another 6 percent don’t know. Not surprisingly, age is a strong factor in opinions on the issue. Only 47 percent of Middle Tennesseans age 18-21 favor graduated driver’s licenses compared to 67 percent of Middle Tennesseans age 22 or older. Gender makes a difference, too. Females (74 percent) are far more supportive of graduated licenses than are males (55 percent). Meanwhile, 65 percent of Middle Tennesseans favor lowering the maximum legal blood-alcohol content for drivers from .10 to .08. Thirty percent oppose lowering the maximum, and 5 percent don’t know. As with opinion on graduated licenses, gender is a strong predictor. Three-fourths of women support lowering the maximum compared to less than two-thirds (61 percent) of men. Furthermore, rural Middle Tennesseans are more supportive of lowering the limit than are urban Middle Tennesseans. Among people living outside Metro Nashville-Davidson County, 71 percent favor lowering the limit compared to 60 percent among those living inside Metro Nashville-Davidson County. The contrast is similar between people living outside and inside the broader Nashville Metropolitan Statistical Area, which includes Davidson County as well as the surrounding counties. Fully three-fourths of those living outside the MSA support lowering the limit compared to not quite two-thirds (64 percent) of those living within the area. Only about one in four Middle Tennesseans (25 percent) would like to see the state’s legislators get a pay increase. Most want legislators’ pay to stay the same (52 percent) or decrease (13 percent). Eleven percent don’t know. While a majority of both men and women oppose legislative pay raises, proportionally more women (33 percent) than men (21 percent) are among the quarter of Middle Tennesseans who favor legislative pay raises. Similarly, about a third (32 percent) of Middle Tennesseans with a high school degree or less favor legislative pay raises compared to 29 percent of those with only some college or trade school experience and 19 percent of those with college degrees. Meanwhile, minorities (43 percent) are more likely than whites (25 percent) to support increasing legislators’ pay, and liberals (36 percent) like the idea more than do conservatives (18 percent) or moderates (28 percent). Most approve of Clinton, Sundquist, Legislature. President Bill Clinton continues to enjoy support among Middle Tennesseans despite his impeachment and acquittal on perjury and obstruction of justice charges in connection with his admitted affair with White House intern Monica Lewinsky. Nearly two-thirds of Middle Tennesseans (60 percent) say they approve of the job Clinton is doing as president. The Fall 1998 Middle Tennessee Poll recorded a 66 percent approval rating for the president. As in Fall 1998, women were more likely to approve of Clinton (68 percent) than were men (58 percent). Clinton also enjoys more support among those with a high school education or less (72 percent) than among those with some college experience (56 percent) or college degrees (64 percent). One of the strongest predictors of support for Clinton is race, with 90 percent of minorities approving of him compared to 60 percent of whites. Not surprisingly, political orientation is a strong correlate as well. Three-fourths (75 percent) of liberals approve of the president, compared to 65 percent of moderates and 45 percent of conservatives. Meanwhile, nearly a third (30 percent) say history will remember Clinton as a "poor" president. Another quarter (26 percent) say history will remember him as a "fair" president, while about another third (30 percent) say he will be remembered as a "good" president. Only 8 percent say he will be remembered as one of history’s "great" presidents. Six percent don’t know. The Congress whose Senate tried and acquitted Clinton will fare slightly worse in the history books, Middle Tennesseans predict. Thirty percent say history will give the Congress a "poor" rating, 43 percent a "fair" rating, 18 percent a "good" rating, and 2 percent a "great" rating. Eight percent don’t know. Support for Gov. Don Sundquist remains strong among Middle Tennesseans. More than two-thirds (68 percent) approve of the governor, now in his second term. About the same proportion (63 percent) expressed approval of him in Fall 1998. Furthermore, the governor’s appeal is consistent across measures of gender, urbanization, age, education, and years in Tennessee. His support falters slightly, however, among minorities who are less likely to approve of him (68 percent) than are whites (85 percent). Not surprisingly, political orientation plays a role here, too. Among liberals, 71 percent approve of the governor, compared to 87 percent of moderates and 84 percent of conservatives. Democratic leaders in the state Legislature have the approval of 56 percent of Middle Tennesseans. Another 18 percent disapprove and, significantly, more than a quarter (26 percent) don’t know. Too many highway projects under way. While more than two-thirds (67 percent) of Middle Tennesseans feel that all the current spending on highways is necessary, a similar percentage (66 percent) feels that too many road projects have been started at once. With highway spending, there are some racial differences, with 69 percent of whites supporting the spending compared to 58 percent of blacks. And among whites, spending is supported as necessary by 74 percent of those within the eight-county Metropolitan Statistical Area but by 62 percent of those outside. Those 49 and younger (70 percent) were also more likely than those 50 and above (51 percent) to believe that the state has started too many road projects at one time. Home healthcare for elderly highly popular. Fully 90 percent of respondents say the state should make more home healthcare available to the elderly, a finding uniform across all political and demographic groups. Imported convicts nixed. More than two-thirds (68 percent) of respondents say the state's private prisons should not be allowed to take out-of-state prisoners, with males (29 percent) more favorable than females (16 percent). Smoking laws a local matter. Just over half (54 percent) of Middle Tennesseans think city and county governments, not the state, should control laws on smoking in restaurants and public buildings. About a third (34 percent) say control belongs in the hands of state government, and 12 percent aren’t sure. Age and education are important factors. Support for local control over smoking laws is greater among Middle Tennesseans age 50 and older (68 percent) than among those ages 18 to 49 (57 percent). Meanwhile, Middle Tennesseans with college degrees are more likely to favor local control (70 percent) than are Middle Tennesseans with only some college or trade school course work (59 percent) or no college experience (56 percent). Race may play a role, too, with 63 percent of white Middle Tennesseans favoring local control compared to only 50 percent of minorities. Death penalty for murder supported. More than two-thirds of Middle Tennesseans (70 percent) say people convicted of murder should be put to death. Twenty-one percent oppose capital punishment for murder, and 9 percent don’t know. Support for capital punishment wavers somewhat across gender, with 71 percent of women supporting it compared to 84 percent of men. Also, whites are more likely to support capital punishment (79 percent) than are minorities (60 percent), and both conservatives (82 percent) and moderates (82 percent) like the idea better than liberals (64 percent). Prison privatization still a bad idea. A majority of Middle Tennesseans (60 percent) think privatizing the state’s prison system would be a bad idea. A fourth (25 percent) think it’s a good idea, and a sizable 15 percent don’t know. The Fall 1998 Middle Tennessee Poll found that 48 percent of Middle Tennesseans thought prison privatization was a bad idea, 45 percent thought it was a good idea, and 8 percent didn’t know. Education a hot topic. Middle Tennesseans are both interested in and talking about education. Approximately 47 percent of the region’s residents say they talk about education often. The top three reasons given for doing so are 1) education’s effect on life (56 percent), 2) to know more about education (48 percent), and 3) to understand education better (45 percent). Board of Regents, University of Tennessee should merge. More than half of Middle Tennesseans (56 percent) say the Board of Regents and the University of Tennessee governing bodies should merge. Respondents perceive little difference between the quality of the schools directed by the governing bodies. Almost three quarters of the sample say colleges directed by the governing bodies are either excellent or good (BOR, 73 percent, UT, 70 percent). Support steady for commuter rail. Fifty-seven percent of Middle Tennesseans would rather build a commuter rail system instead of more roads. Thirty-four percent want more roads instead of a commuter rail system, and 9 percent don’t know. The Fall 1998 Middle Tennessee Poll found that 48 percent of Middle Tennesseans supported focusing on developing a commuter rail system instead of on constructing more roads. The uptick in support for a commuter rail system is negligible, given the two polls’ error margins. Teen smoking laws need toughened. Most Middle Tennesseans (56 percent) say they’d like to see laws on teen smoking made tougher. About a third (33 percent) say the laws should stay the same, and 7 percent say the laws should be made easier. Four percent don’t know. Women (66 percent) are significantly more likely than men (51 percent) to favor stricter teen smoking laws. A slight majority of Middle Tennesseans who hold college degrees (52 percent) support toughening teen smoking laws, but support is stronger among those with only some college or trade school course work (60 percent) or no college experience (64 percent). Politically active Middle Tennesseans relatively rare. During the past five years, about 40 percent of Middle Tennesseans contacted a candidate, and about the same proportion (39 percent) attended a public affairs meeting. But less than a quarter of Middle Tennesseans wrote a letter to an editor (24 percent), called into a talk show (21 percent), spoke at a public meeting (24 percent), or worked in a political campaign (19 percent). Only about 11 percent took part in a public protest. In general, the politically active Middle Tennessean is most likely to be a white male, 35-64 years of age, who is a member of the Republican party, has a bachelor’s college degree or above and an annual household income of more than $50,000. Sample and Method. The poll was conducted by telephone Feb. 15 through March 3, 1999 by students in the College of Mass Communication at Middle Tennessee State University. Students interviewed 610 people age 18 or older chosen at random from the 39 counties making up Middle Tennessee. The poll has an estimated error margin of ± 4 percentage points at the 95 percent level of confidence. Theoretically, this means that a sample of this size should produce a statistical portrait of the sample within 4 percentage points 95 out of 100 times. Other factors, such as question wording also affect the outcome of a survey. Error margins are greater for sample subgroups. The sample varied somewhat from estimates
for age, race and gender proportions obtained from 1997 U.S. Census Bureau
for the Middle Tennessee region because certain demographic groups are
more difficult to contact. The data were thus weighted to more closely
match Census estimates for these demographics. Here are the relevant percentages:
The Middle Tennessee Poll, begun in 1998, is a twice-a-year assessment of attitudes in Middle Tennessee regarding free expression, faith in major institutions, and current political issues. The poll is funded by the John Seigenthaler Chair, Middle Tennessee State University, the university's College of Mass Communication, and the university's School of Journalism. The university's Office of Communication Research sponsors and administers the poll. |
|
Frequencies of all variables for spring 2009 MTSU Poll mainstat Number one problem facing the state Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Health insurance/health services 31 5.3 10.5 10.5 2 Education 28 4.7 9.4 19.9 3 Economy 148 24.9 49.8 69.7 4 Crime 11 1.9 3.8 73.4 5 Taxes 7 1.1 2.2 75.7 6 Government corruption 11 1.8 3.7 79.3 7 Emergency / Disaster readiness 1 .1 .2 79.6 8 Government waste/inefficiency 9 1.5 3.0 82.6 9 Other 23 3.8 7.6 90.2 33 Don't know 29 4.9 9.8 100.0 Total 297 49.9 100.0 Missing System 298 50.1 Total 595 100.0 tengoing Attitude toward 'the way things are going in Tennessee at this time' Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Satisfied 113 18.9 37.9 37.9 2 Dissatisfied 141 23.8 47.6 85.5 27 Refused 1 .2 .4 85.9 33 Don't know/not applicable 42 7.0 14.1 100.0 Total 297 49.9 100.0 Missing System 298 50.1 Total 595 100.0 tennecon Rating of Tennessee's economic conditions today Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Excellent 3 .5 1.0 1.0 2 Good 47 8.0 16.0 17.0 3 Only fair 140 23.6 47.3 64.3 4 Poor 104 17.5 35.0 99.3 33 Refused 2 .4 .7 100.0 Total 297 49.9 100.0 Missing System 298 50.1 Total 595 100.0 mainnat Number one problem facing the nation Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 War in Iraq and/or Afghanistan 11 1.9 3.7 3.7 2 Economy/jobs 195 32.8 65.5 69.2 3 Gas/heating oil crisis 3 .6 1.1 70.3 4 The president 9 1.4 2.9 73.2 5 Terrorism 2 .3 .6 73.8 6 Moral values/family values 13 2.3 4.5 78.4 7 Poverty/homelessness 4 .6 1.2 79.6 8 Education 1 .2 .4 79.9 9 Other: 43 7.2 14.3 94.3 27 Refused 3 .5 1.1 95.3 33 Don't know 14 2.3 4.7 100.0 Total 298 50.1 100.0 Missing System 297 49.9 Total 595 100.0 natgoing Attitude toward the way things are going in the Nation at this time Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Satisfied 45 7.6 15.2 15.2 2 Dissatisfied 224 37.6 75.1 90.4 27 Refused 1 .2 .3 90.7 33 Don't know 28 4.7 9.3 100.0 Total 298 50.1 100.0 Missing System 297 49.9 Total 595 100.0 natecon Rating of National economic conditions today Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Excellent 3 .5 .9 .9 2 Good 7 1.1 2.3 3.2 3 Only fair 83 13.9 27.7 30.9 4 Poor 203 34.2 68.2 99.1 33 Refused 3 .4 .9 100.0 Total 298 50.1 100.0 Missing System 297 49.9 Total 595 100.0 apgov Approve or disapprove of Bredesen's job performance? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Approve 309 52.0 52.0 52.0 2 Disapprove 137 23.0 23.0 75.1 27 Refused 10 1.7 1.7 76.7 33 Don't know/not applicable 138 23.3 23.3 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 apleg Approve or disapprove of Legislative leaders' job performance? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Approve 201 33.8 33.8 33.8 2 Disapprove 193 32.4 32.4 66.2 27 Refused 12 2.0 2.0 68.3 33 Don't know/not applicable 189 31.7 31.7 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 legcntrl Which party would R like to see control Tennessee Legislature? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Democrats 222 37.3 37.3 37.3 2 Republicans 195 32.8 32.8 70.1 27 Refused 15 2.6 2.6 72.7 33 Don't know 163 27.3 27.3 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 apprez Approve or disapprove of Obama's performance? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Approve 318 53.4 53.4 53.4 2 Disapprove 158 26.6 26.6 80.0 27 Refused 7 1.2 1.2 81.2 33 Don't know/not applicable 112 18.8 18.8 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 boecon Confidence in Obama administration's ability to improve the economy Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Very confident 152 25.5 25.5 25.5 2 Somewhat confident 196 33.0 33.0 58.5 3 Not too confident 97 16.3 16.3 74.8 4 Not at all confident 109 18.3 18.3 93.1 27 Refused 2 .3 .3 93.4 33 Don't know 39 6.6 6.6 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 bofgov Confidence in Obama administration's ability to manage the federal government Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Very confident 149 25.0 25.0 25.0 2 Somewhat confident 199 33.5 33.5 58.5 3 Not too confident 89 15.0 15.0 73.5 4 Not at all confident 98 16.5 16.5 90.0 27 Refused 4 .7 .7 90.8 33 Don't know 55 9.2 9.2 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 boethics Confidence in Obama administration's ethical standards? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 1 Very confident 202 34.0 34.0 34.0 2 2 Somewhat confident 160 26.9 26.9 60.8 3 3 Not too confident 79 13.2 13.2 74.1 4 4 Not at all confident 101 17.0 17.0 91.0 27 r Refused 4 .7 .7 91.7 33 x Don't know 49 8.3 8.3 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 bofrnrel Confidence in Obama administration's ability to manage American foreign policy? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Very confident 156 26.2 26.2 26.2 2 Somewhat confident 183 30.8 30.8 57.0 3 Not too confident 91 15.4 15.4 72.4 4 Not at all confident 98 16.4 16.4 88.8 27 Refused 4 .7 .7 89.5 33 Don't know 63 10.5 10.5 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 obamcoop Is Obama doing enough to cooperate with Republicans in Congress? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Yes, doing enough 322 54.2 54.2 54.2 2 No, not doing enough 174 29.3 29.3 83.5 27 Refused 6 1.1 1.1 84.6 33 Don't know 91 15.4 15.4 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 repcoop Are Republicans in Congress doing enough to cooperate with Obama? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Yes, doing enough 143 24.0 24.0 24.0 2 No, not doing enough 349 58.7 58.7 82.7 27 Refused 9 1.5 1.5 84.2 33 Don't know 94 15.8 15.8 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 rechurt Has this recession hurt you financially? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Yes 390 65.6 65.6 65.6 2 No 187 31.4 31.4 97.0 33 Don't know 18 3.0 3.0 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 howhurt IF RECESSION HAS HURT: A great deal, or somewhat? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 A great deal 205 34.4 52.4 52.4 2 Only somewhat 180 30.3 46.2 98.6 33 Don't know 5 .9 1.4 100.0 Total 390 65.6 100.0 Missing System 205 34.4 Total 595 100.0 worrynat How worried about nation's economy over next few years? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Very worried 246 41.4 41.4 41.4 2 Somewhat worried 233 39.1 39.1 80.6 3 Not too worried 72 12.1 12.1 92.6 4 Not worried at all 37 6.3 6.3 98.9 27 Refused 2 .3 .3 99.2 33 Don't know 5 .8 .8 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 worryfam How worried about own family's financial situation over next few years? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Very worried 140 23.6 23.6 23.6 2 Somewhat worried 237 39.9 39.9 63.5 3 Not too worried 142 23.8 23.8 87.4 4 Not worried at all 71 11.9 11.9 99.3 27 Refused 2 .4 .4 99.7 33 Don't know 2 .3 .3 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 irqhowgo How are things going for the U.S. in Iraq? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Very well 67 11.3 12.4 12.4 2 Moderately well 260 43.7 48.0 60.4 3 Moderately badly 138 23.3 25.5 85.9 4 Very badly 76 12.8 14.1 100.0 Total 542 91.2 100.0 Missing 27 Refused 3 .5 33 Don't know 50 8.4 Total 53 8.8 Total 595 100.0 irqmstk Was sending troops to Iraq a mistake, or not? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Was a mistake 317 53.3 53.3 53.3 2 Was not a mistake 228 38.3 38.3 91.6 27 Refused 8 1.3 1.3 92.9 33 Don't know 42 7.1 7.1 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 ojkme Own opinion of jokes that refer to Obama's race Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Definitely humorous 20 3.4 3.4 3.4 2 Probably humorous 73 12.2 12.2 15.6 3 Probably not humorous 124 20.9 20.9 36.5 4 Definitely not humorous 331 55.7 55.7 92.2 27 Refused 8 1.4 1.4 93.6 33 Don't know 38 6.4 6.4 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 ojkoth Perception of most others' opinion of jokes that refer to Obama's race Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Definitely humorous 29 4.9 4.9 4.9 2 Probably humorous 154 26.0 26.0 30.8 3 Probably not humorous 177 29.8 29.8 60.6 4 Definitely not humorous 145 24.4 24.4 85.0 27 Refused 8 1.3 1.3 86.3 33 Don't know 82 13.7 13.7 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 joktell Number of occasions one has told a joke about Obama's race Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 0 482 81.0 84.8 84.8 1 15 2.6 2.7 87.5 2 17 2.9 3.1 90.6 3 15 2.5 2.7 93.2 4 4 .6 .6 93.9 5 12 2.1 2.2 96.1 6 6 .9 1.0 97.0 8 2 .3 .4 97.4 10 5 .9 .9 98.3 15 3 .5 .5 98.9 20 3 .5 .5 99.4 30 2 .3 .3 99.7 48 1 .2 .2 99.9 500 1 .1 .1 100.0 Total 568 95.6 100.0 Missing 999 No answer 26 4.4 Total 595 100.0 sptncare State spending on TennCare Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Too little 224 37.6 37.6 37.6 2 About right 157 26.3 26.3 64.0 3 Too much 112 18.8 18.8 82.8 27 Refused 4 .7 .7 83.5 33 Don't know 98 16.5 16.5 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 spwelfar State spending on Welfare Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Too little 152 25.6 25.6 25.6 2 About right 139 23.3 23.3 48.9 3 Too much 179 30.1 30.1 79.0 27 Refused 7 1.2 1.2 80.2 33 Don't know 118 19.8 19.8 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 spunivs State spending on universities Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Too little 306 51.4 51.4 51.4 2 About right 128 21.5 21.5 73.0 3 Too much 63 10.6 10.6 83.6 27 Refused 4 .6 .6 84.2 33 Don't know 94 15.8 15.8 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 spcoltek State spending on community colleges and technical schools Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Too little 324 54.4 54.4 54.4 2 About right 141 23.7 23.7 78.2 3 Too much 23 3.9 3.9 82.1 27 Refused 4 .7 .7 82.8 33 Don't know 102 17.2 17.2 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 sphwyrep State spending on highway maintenance Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Too little 210 35.3 35.3 35.3 2 About right 221 37.1 37.1 72.4 3 Too much 98 16.4 16.4 88.8 27 Refused 5 .8 .8 89.7 33 Don't know 62 10.3 10.3 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 sphwybld State spending on highway construction Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Too little 147 24.8 24.8 24.8 2 About right 223 37.5 37.5 62.3 3 Too much 115 19.4 19.4 81.7 27 Refused 7 1.2 1.2 82.8 33 Don't know 102 17.2 17.2 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 spenviro State spending on the environment Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Too little 292 49.1 49.1 49.1 2 About right 151 25.4 25.4 74.5 3 Too much 59 10.0 10.0 84.5 27 Refused 7 1.2 1.2 85.6 33 Don't know 86 14.4 14.4 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 sphseduc State spending on elementary and secondary education Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Too little 371 62.4 62.4 62.4 2 About right 137 23.1 23.1 85.5 3 Too much 30 5.0 5.0 90.5 27 Refused 4 .7 .7 91.2 33 Don't know 52 8.8 8.8 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 splawenf State spending on law enforcement agencies Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Too little 235 39.5 39.5 39.5 2 About right 187 31.4 31.4 70.9 3 Too much 69 11.7 11.7 82.6 27 Refused 8 1.3 1.3 83.9 33 Don't know 96 16.1 16.1 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 sphcappd State spending on programs for handicapped Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Too little 281 47.3 47.3 47.3 2 About right 154 25.9 25.9 73.1 3 Too much 13 2.1 2.1 75.3 27 Refused 4 .6 .6 75.9 33 Don't know 143 24.1 24.1 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 sprtrded State spending on programs for mentally retarded Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Too little 281 47.3 47.3 47.3 2 About right 127 21.3 21.3 68.6 3 Too much 10 1.7 1.7 70.3 27 Refused 5 .9 .9 71.3 33 Don't know 171 28.7 28.7 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 spfoster State spending on foster care services Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Too little 259 43.5 43.5 43.5 2 About right 106 17.9 17.9 61.4 3 Too much 13 2.2 2.2 63.5 27 Refused 11 1.8 1.8 65.4 33 Don't know 206 34.6 34.6 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 spmhelth State spending on mental health Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Too little 261 43.9 43.9 43.9 2 About right 136 22.9 22.9 66.8 3 Too much 16 2.7 2.7 69.5 27 Refused 5 .8 .8 70.3 33 Don't know 176 29.7 29.7 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 spmtrans State spending on mass transit Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Too little 263 44.2 44.2 44.2 2 About right 157 26.4 26.4 70.6 3 Too much 51 8.6 8.6 79.1 27 Refused 5 .9 .9 80.0 33 Don't know 119 20.0 20.0 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 taxsplit Key to tax question split Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Ban, then introduce with sales tax cut 291 49.0 49.0 49.0 2 Introduce with sales tax cut, then ban 303 51.0 51.0 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 tntaxes1 Preferred action on state income tax. Choice order: ban / enact with sales tax cut Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1.0 Amend constitution to forbid income tax 124 20.9 42.6 42.6 2.0 Lower sales taxes by introducing an income tax 133 22.4 45.6 88.2 27.0 Refused 1 .2 .5 88.7 33.0 Don't know 33 5.6 11.3 100.0 Total 291 49.0 100.0 Missing System 303 51.0 Total 595 100.0 tntaxes2 Preferred action on state income tax - Choice order: enact with sales tax cut / ban Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Lower sales taxes by introducing an income tax 102 17.1 33.6 33.6 2 Amend constitution to forbid income tax 147 24.7 48.5 82.1 27 Refused 8 1.3 2.5 84.6 33 Don't know 47 7.8 15.4 100.0 Total 303 51.0 100.0 Missing System 291 49.0 Total 595 100.0 sellwine Favor or oppose letting grocery stores sell wine? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Favor 367 61.7 61.7 61.7 2 Oppose 155 26.0 26.0 87.8 27 Refused 3 .6 .6 88.3 33 Don't know 69 11.7 11.7 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 aborlegl Do you think abortion should be legal under any circumstances, legal only under certain circumstances, or illegal in all Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 1 Legal under any circumstances 110 18.5 18.5 18.5 2 2 Legal under certain circumstances 308 51.8 51.8 70.3 3 3 Illegal in all circumstances 151 25.4 25.4 95.7 27 r Refused 9 1.5 1.5 97.2 33 x Don't know 17 2.8 2.8 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 spgrpkey Key to spiral of silence group rotation Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Strangers 169 28.4 28.4 28.4 2 Friends 209 35.2 35.2 63.6 3 Family 217 36.4 36.4 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 willing_climate Spiral of silence question order key: Willingness, then climate Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid .00 False 268 45.0 45.0 45.0 1.00 True 327 55.0 55.0 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 genspeak Willingness to speak out among: [STRANGERS, FRIENDS, FAMILY] Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid .00 Least willing 76 12.7 12.8 12.8 1 45 7.6 7.6 20.4 2 38 6.4 6.4 26.8 3 105 17.6 17.6 44.5 4.00 Most willing 329 55.4 55.5 100.0 Total 593 99.7 100.0 Missing System 2 .3 Total 595 100.0 CURRENT_CLIMATE Opinion climate right now among whatever social group R was asked about Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1.00 Congruent 309 51.9 51.9 51.9 2.00 Incongruent 119 20.0 20.0 72.0 3.00 Evenly divided 119 20.1 20.1 92.1 27.00 Refused 1 .1 .1 92.2 33.00 Don't know 47 7.8 7.8 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 CONGRUENT_NOW Congruent now with social group R was asked about? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid .00 No 286 48.1 48.1 48.1 1.00 Yes 309 51.9 51.9 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 future_climate Future opinion climate among whatever social group R was asked about Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1.00 Congruent 294 49.5 49.5 49.5 2.00 Incongruent 143 24.1 24.1 73.5 3.00 Evenly divided 99 16.7 16.7 90.2 27.00 Refused 1 .1 .1 90.3 33.00 Don't know 58 9.7 9.7 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 CONGRUENT_FUTURE Congruent in future with social group R was asked about? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid .00 No 301 50.5 50.5 50.5 1.00 Yes 294 49.5 49.5 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 OPACCEPT Likelihood that (STRANGERS, FRIENDS, FAMILY) would accept R's opinion Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid .00 Very unlikely 82 13.8 13.9 13.9 1 63 10.7 10.7 24.6 2.00 Don't know 65 11.0 11.0 35.7 3 109 18.4 18.6 54.2 4.00 Very likely 270 45.4 45.8 100.0 Total 590 99.2 100.0 Missing System 5 .8 Total 595 100.0 OPHARM Likelihood of harm to relationship with (STRANGERS, FRIENDS, FAMILY) Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid .00 Very unlikely 326 54.8 55.4 55.4 1 78 13.1 13.2 68.7 2.00 Don't know 68 11.5 11.6 80.3 3 43 7.2 7.3 87.6 4.00 Very likely 73 12.3 12.4 100.0 Total 588 98.9 100.0 Missing System 7 1.1 Total 595 100.0 friends Asked about friends? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid .00 No 386 64.8 64.8 64.8 1.00 Yes 209 35.2 35.2 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 family Asked about family? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid .00 No 378 63.6 63.6 63.6 1.00 Yes 217 36.4 36.4 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 fear_isolation Fear of isolation (7 = most fearful) Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 0 74 12.5 12.5 12.5 1 77 12.9 12.9 25.4 2 103 17.4 17.4 42.8 3 127 21.3 21.3 64.1 4 134 22.5 22.5 86.6 5 57 9.5 9.5 96.2 6 21 3.6 3.6 99.7 7 2 .3 .3 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 pucog1pa Spiral of silence experiment component variable Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 27 4.6 34.7 34.7 2 17 2.9 22.2 56.9 3 24 4.0 30.1 87.0 33 10 1.7 13.0 100.0 Total 78 13.1 100.0 Missing System 517 86.9 Total 595 100.0 pufog1pa Spiral of silence experiment component variable Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 24 4.0 30.2 30.2 2 22 3.6 27.7 57.9 3 22 3.8 28.7 86.6 33 10 1.8 13.4 100.0 Total 78 13.1 100.0 Missing System 517 86.9 Total 595 100.0 putog1pa Spiral of silence experiment component variable Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 15 2.6 19.5 19.5 2 21 3.6 27.3 46.8 3 14 2.3 17.5 64.2 4 10 1.6 12.2 76.4 27 1 .2 1.3 77.7 33 17 2.9 22.3 100.0 Total 78 13.1 100.0 Missing System 517 86.9 Total 595 100.0 puhog1pa Spiral of silence experiment component variable Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 13 2.2 16.5 16.5 2 16 2.6 20.2 36.7 3 17 2.9 22.2 58.9 4 13 2.3 17.2 76.1 27 1 .2 1.3 77.4 33 18 3.0 22.6 100.0 Total 78 13.1 100.0 Missing System 517 86.9 Total 595 100.0 strngrg1 Spiral of silence experiment component variable Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 60 10.1 35.6 35.6 2 34 5.7 20.1 55.7 3 23 3.9 13.9 69.6 4 37 6.2 21.8 91.4 33 15 2.4 8.6 100.0 Total 169 28.4 100.0 Missing System 426 71.6 Total 595 100.0 pucog1pb Spiral of silence experiment component variable Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 28 4.7 30.9 30.9 2 24 4.0 26.3 57.2 3 28 4.7 30.5 87.7 33 11 1.9 12.3 100.0 Total 91 15.3 100.0 Missing System 504 84.7 Total 595 100.0 pufog1pb Spiral of silence experiment component variable Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 25 4.3 27.9 27.9 2 30 5.0 32.4 60.4 3 25 4.2 27.3 87.7 33 11 1.9 12.3 100.0 Total 91 15.3 100.0 Missing System 504 84.7 Total 595 100.0 putog1pb Spiral of silence experiment component variable Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 15 2.5 16.2 16.2 2 26 4.3 28.3 44.4 3 17 2.9 18.9 63.3 4 15 2.5 16.4 79.7 27 2 .3 2.2 81.9 33 16 2.8 18.1 100.0 Total 91 15.3 100.0 Missing System 504 84.7 Total 595 100.0 puhog1pb Spiral of silence experiment component variable Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 13 2.2 14.2 14.2 2 14 2.3 14.9 29.1 3 18 3.0 19.4 48.5 4 21 3.6 23.5 72.0 27 3 .5 3.6 75.5 33 22 3.7 24.5 100.0 Total 91 15.3 100.0 Missing System 504 84.7 Total 595 100.0 frcog2pa Spiral of silence experiment component variable Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 53 8.9 54.8 54.8 2 20 3.4 21.4 76.2 3 18 3.1 18.9 95.1 33 5 .8 4.9 100.0 Total 96 16.1 100.0 Missing System 499 83.9 Total 595 100.0 frfog2pa Spiral of silence experiment component variable Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 53 8.9 55.4 55.4 2 21 3.5 22.0 77.4 3 13 2.1 13.3 90.6 33 9 1.5 9.4 100.0 Total 96 16.1 100.0 Missing System 499 83.9 Total 595 100.0 frtog2pa Spiral of silence experiment component variable Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 45 7.5 46.5 46.5 2 18 3.0 18.3 64.9 3 10 1.7 10.8 75.6 4 15 2.4 15.2 90.8 33 9 1.5 9.2 100.0 Total 96 16.1 100.0 Missing System 499 83.9 Total 595 100.0 frhog2pa Spiral of silence experiment component variable Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 11 1.9 11.7 11.7 2 2 .3 2.1 13.8 3 13 2.2 13.6 27.4 4 63 10.5 65.3 92.7 27 1 .1 .6 93.3 33 6 1.1 6.7 100.0 Total 96 16.1 100.0 Missing System 499 83.9 Total 595 100.0 frendsg2 Spiral of silence experiment component variable Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 138 23.3 66.2 66.2 2 34 5.7 16.2 82.5 3 4 .7 2.1 84.5 4 18 3.0 8.6 93.2 27 1 .2 .6 93.8 33 13 2.2 6.2 100.0 Total 209 35.2 100.0 Missing System 386 64.8 Total 595 100.0 frcog2pb Spiral of silence experiment component variable Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 56 9.4 49.4 49.4 2 29 4.9 25.6 75.0 3 23 3.8 20.1 95.1 27 1 .1 .6 95.7 33 5 .8 4.3 100.0 Total 113 19.0 100.0 Missing System 482 81.0 Total 595 100.0 frfog2pb Spiral of silence experiment component variable Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 50 8.3 43.9 43.9 2 34 5.7 30.1 74.0 3 23 3.8 19.9 93.9 27 1 .1 .6 94.6 33 6 1.0 5.4 100.0 Total 113 19.0 100.0 Missing System 482 81.0 Total 595 100.0 frtog2pb Spiral of silence experiment component variable Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 60 10.0 52.7 52.7 2 20 3.3 17.6 70.2 3 9 1.6 8.2 78.4 4 16 2.6 13.8 92.2 27 1 .1 .6 92.9 33 8 1.4 7.1 100.0 Total 113 19.0 100.0 Missing System 482 81.0 Total 595 100.0 frhog2pb Spiral of silence experiment component variable Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 13 2.2 11.4 11.4 2 5 .9 4.8 16.2 3 14 2.4 12.6 28.9 4 72 12.1 63.8 92.7 27 1 .1 .6 93.3 33 8 1.3 6.7 100.0 Total 113 19.0 100.0 Missing System 482 81.0 Total 595 100.0 facog3pa Spiral of silence experiment component variable Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 63 10.6 67.2 67.2 2 11 1.8 11.7 78.9 3 13 2.1 13.5 92.3 33 7 1.2 7.7 100.0 Total 93 15.7 100.0 Missing System 501 84.3 Total 595 100.0 fafog3pa Spiral of silence experiment component variable Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 57 9.6 60.8 60.8 2 19 3.1 19.9 80.8 3 10 1.6 10.3 91.1 33 8 1.4 8.9 100.0 Total 93 15.7 100.0 Missing System 501 84.3 Total 595 100.0 fatog3pa Spiral of silence experiment component variable Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 55 9.3 59.3 59.3 2 11 1.9 11.9 71.2 3 6 1.1 6.8 78.0 4 14 2.4 15.0 93.0 27 1 .1 .7 93.7 33 6 1.0 6.3 100.0 Total 93 15.7 100.0 Missing System 501 84.3 Total 595 100.0 fahog3pa Spiral of silence experiment component variable Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 8 1.3 8.5 8.5 2 3 .5 3.4 11.8 3 8 1.4 8.9 20.7 4 68 11.4 72.5 93.2 27 1 .1 .7 93.9 33 6 1.0 6.1 100.0 Total 93 15.7 100.0 Missing System 501 84.3 Total 595 100.0 familyg3 Spiral of silence experiment component variable Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 131 22.0 60.3 60.3 2 37 6.2 16.9 77.2 3 17 2.9 8.0 85.3 4 21 3.5 9.6 94.9 27 1 .1 .3 95.2 33 10 1.8 4.8 100.0 Total 217 36.4 100.0 Missing System 378 63.6 Total 595 100.0 facog3pb Spiral of silence experiment component variable Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 82 13.8 66.9 66.9 2 18 3.0 14.3 81.2 3 15 2.5 11.9 93.1 33 9 1.4 6.9 100.0 Total 123 20.7 100.0 Missing System 472 79.3 Total 595 100.0 fafog3pb Spiral of silence experiment component variable Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 85 14.4 69.5 69.5 2 18 3.1 14.7 84.2 3 7 1.2 5.6 89.8 33 13 2.1 10.2 100.0 Total 123 20.7 100.0 Missing System 472 79.3 Total 595 100.0 fatog3pb Spiral of silence experiment component variable Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 80 13.5 65.4 65.4 2 14 2.3 11.2 76.6 3 7 1.1 5.4 82.0 4 13 2.2 10.7 92.6 27 1 .1 .5 93.1 33 9 1.4 6.9 100.0 Total 123 20.7 100.0 Missing System 472 79.3 Total 595 100.0 fahog3pb Spiral of silence experiment component variable Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 15 2.6 12.4 12.4 2 3 .5 2.4 14.8 3 7 1.2 5.8 20.5 4 89 14.9 72.0 92.5 27 1 .1 .5 93.0 33 9 1.4 7.0 100.0 Total 123 20.7 100.0 Missing System 472 79.3 Total 595 100.0 partyid Political party Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Republican 184 30.9 31.1 31.1 2 Democrat 187 31.5 31.7 62.7 3 Independent 146 24.5 24.7 87.4 4 Other 48 8.0 8.1 95.5 27 Refused 9 1.6 1.6 97.0 33 Don't know 18 2.9 3.0 100.0 Total 592 99.5 100.0 Missing System 3 .5 Total 595 100.0 stronrep Strong republican Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Strong 98 16.5 53.3 53.3 2 Not very strong 83 14.0 45.2 98.4 33 Don't know 3 .5 1.6 100.0 Total 184 30.9 100.0 Missing System 411 69.1 Total 595 100.0 strondem Strong democrat Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Strong 124 20.8 65.9 65.9 2 Not very strong 59 10.0 31.7 97.6 27 Refused 1 .1 .3 97.9 33 Don't know 4 .7 2.1 100.0 Total 187 31.5 100.0 Missing System 407 68.5 Total 595 100.0 indlean Close to republican or democrat? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Closer to Republican 48 8.0 33.2 33.2 2 Closer to Democrat 37 6.3 25.8 59.0 3 Neither 58 9.7 40.0 99.1 27 Refused 1 .1 .5 99.6 33 Don't know 1 .1 .4 100.0 Total 144 24.2 100.0 Missing System 451 75.8 Total 595 100.0 whovote4 Who vote for in 2008 presidential race? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Obama 195 32.7 33.1 33.1 2 McCain 214 35.9 36.3 69.4 3 Someone else 25 4.2 4.2 73.6 4 Didn't vote 108 18.1 18.3 91.9 27 Refused 36 6.0 6.1 98.0 33 Don't know 12 2.0 2.0 100.0 Total 589 99.0 100.0 Missing System 6 1.0 Total 595 100.0 edletter [Have you ...] Written a letter to a newspaper, magazine or television news program? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 1 Yes 95 15.9 16.2 16.2 2 2 No 487 81.9 83.0 99.1 27 r Refused 3 .5 .5 99.7 33 x Don't know 2 .3 .3 100.0 Total 587 98.7 100.0 Missing System 8 1.3 Total 595 100.0 calledin [Have you ...] Called in to a radio or television talk show? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 1 Yes 89 14.9 15.1 15.1 2 2 No 494 83.0 84.0 99.1 27 r Refused 3 .5 .5 99.7 33 x Don't know 2 .3 .3 100.0 Total 588 98.8 100.0 Missing System 7 1.2 Total 595 100.0 contcand [Have you ...] Contacted a candidate for public office or an elected official? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 1 Yes 203 34.1 34.5 34.5 2 2 No 379 63.7 64.4 98.9 27 r Refused 2 .3 .3 99.2 33 x Don't know 5 .8 .8 100.0 Total 588 98.8 100.0 Missing System 7 1.2 Total 595 100.0 gotomeet [Have you ...] Attended a public meeting of an organization interested in public affairs? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 1 Yes 192 32.3 32.6 32.6 2 2 No 388 65.3 66.0 98.7 27 r Refused 3 .5 .5 99.2 33 x Don't know 5 .8 .8 100.0 Total 588 98.8 100.0 Missing System 7 1.2 Total 595 100.0 talkmeet [Have you ...] Spoken out at a public meeting of an organization interested in public affairs? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 1 Yes 103 17.3 17.5 17.5 2 2 No 477 80.2 81.3 98.8 27 r Refused 3 .5 .5 99.3 33 x Don't know 4 .7 .7 100.0 Total 587 98.7 100.0 Missing System 8 1.3 Total 595 100.0 protest [Have you ...] Taken part in a public demonstration or march? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 1 Yes 55 9.2 9.4 9.4 2 2 No 525 88.3 89.5 98.9 27 r Refused 3 .5 .5 99.4 33 x Don't know 4 .6 .6 100.0 Total 587 98.7 100.0 Missing System 8 1.3 Total 595 100.0 workcamp [Have you ...] Worked in a political campaign? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 1 Yes 68 11.5 11.6 11.6 2 2 No 514 86.5 87.5 99.1 27 r Refused 3 .5 .5 99.7 33 x Don't know 2 .3 .3 100.0 Total 588 98.8 100.0 Missing System 7 1.2 Total 595 100.0 uptodate How often follow what's going on in government and public affairs? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Hardly at all 43 7.2 7.3 7.3 2 Only now and then 71 11.9 12.1 19.4 3 Some of the time 155 26.0 26.4 45.8 4 Most of the time 310 52.1 52.9 98.6 27 Refused 3 .5 .5 99.2 33 Don't know 5 .8 .8 100.0 Total 586 98.5 100.0 Missing System 9 1.5 Total 595 100.0 veep What job does Joe Biden hold? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Vice president 457 76.9 79.0 79.0 2 Any incorrect answer 12 2.1 2.1 81.1 27 Refused 4 .7 .8 81.9 33 Don't know 105 17.6 18.1 100.0 Total 579 97.3 100.0 Missing System 16 2.7 Total 595 100.0 jdreview Who determines whether a law is constitutional? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Supreme Court 406 68.4 70.4 70.4 2 Any incorrect answer 88 14.8 15.3 85.6 27 Refused 4 .6 .6 86.3 33 Don't know 79 13.4 13.7 100.0 Total 578 97.1 100.0 Missing System 17 2.9 Total 595 100.0 twothrds How much of a majority required to override a veto? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Two-thirds 254 42.7 43.9 43.9 2 Any incorrect answer 82 13.7 14.1 58.0 27 Refused 4 .6 .6 58.7 33 Don't know 239 40.2 41.3 100.0 Total 578 97.1 100.0 Missing System 17 2.9 Total 595 100.0 housmaj Which party holds a majority in the U.S. House of Representatives? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Democrat 412 69.4 71.5 71.5 2 Any incorrect answer 56 9.4 9.7 81.2 27 Refused 6 1.0 1.0 82.3 33 Don't know 102 17.2 17.7 100.0 Total 577 97.0 100.0 Missing System 18 3.0 Total 595 100.0 conparty Which party is more conservative than the other? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Republican 350 58.8 60.7 60.7 2 2 No, both parties are equally conservative 71 11.9 12.3 73.0 3 Any incorrect answer besides "No" 58 9.8 10.1 83.0 27 Refused 7 1.3 1.3 84.3 33 Don't know 90 15.2 15.7 100.0 Total 577 97.0 100.0 Missing System 18 3.0 Total 595 100.0 isolwory "I worry about being isolated if people disagree with me." Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 True 41 6.9 7.2 7.2 2 Not true 515 86.6 89.9 97.1 27 Refused 3 .5 .5 97.7 33 Don't know 13 2.2 2.3 100.0 Total 573 96.3 100.0 Missing System 22 3.7 Total 595 100.0 avoid "I don't worry about other people avoiding me." Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 True 350 58.8 61.1 61.1 2 Not true 203 34.1 35.4 96.5 27 Refused 3 .6 .6 97.0 33 Don't know 17 2.9 3.0 100.0 Total 573 96.3 100.0 Missing System 22 3.7 Total 595 100.0 tell "I avoid telling other people what I think when there's a risk they would avoid me if they knew my opinion Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 1 True 101 16.9 17.6 17.6 2 2 Not true 429 72.2 74.9 92.5 27 r Refused 4 .7 .7 93.2 33 x Don't know 39 6.5 6.8 100.0 Total 573 96.3 100.0 Missing System 22 3.7 Total 595 100.0 dodgargu "I enjoy avoiding arguments." Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 1 True 315 52.9 55.1 55.1 2 2 Not true 205 34.5 35.9 90.9 27 r Refused 5 .9 1.0 91.9 33 x Don't know 46 7.8 8.1 100.0 Total 572 96.1 100.0 Missing System 23 3.9 Total 595 100.0 argintel "Arguing over controversial issues improves my intelligence." Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 1 True 234 39.3 40.7 40.7 2 2 Not true 286 48.1 49.9 90.6 27 r Refused 4 .6 .7 91.3 33 x Don't know 50 8.4 8.7 100.0 Total 574 96.5 100.0 Missing System 21 3.5 Total 595 100.0 enjargue "I enjoy a good argument over a controversial issue." Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 1 True 293 49.3 51.2 51.2 2 2 Not true 254 42.7 44.3 95.6 27 r Refused 2 .3 .3 95.9 33 x Don't know 23 3.9 4.1 100.0 Total 573 96.3 100.0 Missing System 22 3.7 Total 595 100.0 avargue "I try to avoid getting into arguments." Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 1 True 422 71.0 73.7 73.7 2 2 Not true 129 21.6 22.4 96.2 27 r Refused 3 .4 .4 96.6 33 x Don't know 19 3.2 3.4 100.0 Total 573 96.3 100.0 Missing System 22 3.7 Total 595 100.0 reborn Are you born again? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Yes 340 57.2 65.6 65.6 2 No 178 30.0 34.4 100.0 Total 518 87.2 100.0 Missing 27 Refused 6 1.1 33 Don't know 44 7.4 System 26 4.4 Total 76 12.8 Total 595 100.0 savesoul Ever evangelized? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Yes 389 65.5 70.0 70.0 2 No 167 28.1 30.0 100.0 Total 556 93.5 100.0 Missing 27 Refused 4 .7 33 Don't know 5 .9 System 29 4.9 Total 38 6.5 Total 595 100.0 rapture Believe in the "Rapture"? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Yes 321 54.0 64.8 64.8 2 No 174 29.3 35.2 100.0 Total 496 83.3 100.0 Missing 27 Refused 16 2.6 33 Don't know 54 9.2 System 29 4.9 Total 99 16.7 Total 595 100.0 bible View of the Bible Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Literal word of God 225 37.8 39.8 39.8 2 Inspired, but not literal, word of God 265 44.5 46.9 86.6 3 Book of fables, etc., recorded by men 50 8.4 8.8 95.5 12 1 .1 .1 95.6 99 Refused or don't know 25 4.2 4.4 100.0 Total 565 95.0 100.0 Missing System 30 5.0 Total 595 100.0 educ Last school year completed Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 2 Elementary 11 1.8 1.9 1.9 3 Some high school 52 8.7 9.3 11.2 4 High school grad 172 29.0 30.9 42.1 5 Some trade 17 2.9 3.0 45.2 6 Some college 106 17.9 19.1 64.3 7 College grad 135 22.7 24.2 88.5 8 Some graduate study 14 2.3 2.5 91.0 9 Master's 40 6.8 7.2 98.2 10 Doctorate 10 1.7 1.8 100.0 Total 558 93.8 100.0 Missing 27 Refused 3 .6 33 Don't know 4 .6 System 30 5.0 Total 37 6.2 Total 595 100.0 race What race are you? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 White 464 78.0 82.2 82.2 2 Black or African-American 57 9.5 10.0 92.2 3 Asian or Pacific Islander 2 .3 .4 92.6 4 Native American or Alaskan Native 5 .9 .9 93.5 5 Other 20 3.3 3.5 97.0 27 Refused/not applicable (volunteered) 7 1.2 1.2 98.2 33 Don't know/no opinion (volunteered) 10 1.7 1.8 100.0 Total 565 95.0 100.0 Missing System 30 5.0 Total 595 100.0 income What is your income level? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 10,000 or less 35 5.8 7.7 7.7 2 10,001 to 15,000 31 5.2 6.9 14.6 3 15,001 to 20,000 20 3.3 4.4 18.9 4 20,001 to 25,000 28 4.7 6.1 25.1 5 25,001 to 30,000 33 5.5 7.3 32.4 6 30,001 to 35,000 22 3.7 4.8 37.2 7 35,001 to 40,000 23 3.9 5.2 42.4 8 40,001 to 45,000 27 4.5 5.9 48.3 9 45,001 to 50,000 24 4.0 5.2 53.6 10 50,001 to 75,000 73 12.2 16.1 69.7 11 75,001 to 99,999 67 11.3 14.8 84.5 12 100,000 or more 70 11.7 15.5 100.0 Total 451 75.9 100.0 Missing 27 Refused/not applicable 80 13.5 33 Dont know/no opinion 32 5.4 System 31 5.2 Total 143 24.1 Total 595 100.0 areacodx AREACODX Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 0 96 16.2 17.1 17.1 423 135 22.6 23.9 41.0 615 65 11.0 11.6 52.6 731 51 8.6 9.1 61.7 865 76 12.7 13.4 75.1 901 51 8.5 9.0 84.1 931 90 15.1 15.9 100.0 Total 564 94.8 100.0 Missing System 31 5.2 Total 595 100.0 msacod Census Bureau Metropolitan Area Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 0 Non-MSA 202 34.0 35.9 35.9 1560 Chattanooga, TN-GA MSA 35 5.8 6.2 42.0 1660 Clarksville-Hopkinsville, TN-KY MSA 19 3.2 3.4 45.4 3580 Jackson, TN MSA 6 1.1 1.1 46.5 3660 Johnson City-Kingsport-Bristol, TN-VA MSA 31 5.3 5.5 52.1 3840 Knoxville, TN MSA 61 10.3 10.8 62.9 4920 Memphis, TN-AR-MS MSA 51 8.5 9.0 71.9 5360 Nashville, TN MSA 159 26.7 28.1 100.0 Total 564 94.8 100.0 Missing System 31 5.2 Total 595 100.0 regvotex Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 0 66 11.1 11.3 11.3 1 518 87.2 88.7 100.0 Total 584 98.3 100.0 Missing System 10 1.7 Total 595 100.0 whovotex Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 0 108 18.1 19.9 19.9 1 433 72.8 80.1 100.0 Total 541 90.9 100.0 Missing System 54 9.1 Total 595 100.0 edlettex Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 0 487 81.9 83.7 83.7 1 95 15.9 16.3 100.0 Total 582 97.8 100.0 Missing System 13 2.2 Total 595 100.0 calledx Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 0 494 83.0 84.7 84.7 1 89 14.9 15.3 100.0 Total 583 98.0 100.0 Missing System 12 2.0 Total 595 100.0 contcanx Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 0 379 63.7 65.1 65.1 1 203 34.1 34.9 100.0 Total 581 97.7 100.0 Missing System 14 2.3 Total 595 100.0 gomeetx Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 0 388 65.3 66.9 66.9 1 192 32.3 33.1 100.0 Total 580 97.5 100.0 Missing System 15 2.5 Total 595 100.0 talkmeex Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 0 477 80.2 82.3 82.3 1 103 17.3 17.7 100.0 Total 580 97.5 100.0 Missing System 15 2.5 Total 595 100.0 protestx Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 0 525 88.3 90.5 90.5 1 55 9.2 9.5 100.0 Total 580 97.5 100.0 Missing System 15 2.5 Total 595 100.0 workcamx Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 0 514 86.5 88.3 88.3 1 68 11.5 11.7 100.0 Total 583 98.0 100.0 Missing System 12 2.0 Total 595 100.0 tennmood Index of governor approval, tenn direction and tenn econ Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 0 47 8.0 24.4 24.4 33.33333333333333 62 10.5 32.1 56.5 66.66666666666666 62 10.5 32.2 88.7 100 22 3.7 11.3 100.0 Total 194 32.6 100.0 Missing System 401 67.4 Total 595 100.0 natmood Index of prez approval, national direction and national econ Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 0 70 11.7 34.3 34.3 33.33333333333333 99 16.7 48.9 83.3 66.66666666666666 33 5.5 16.1 99.4 100 1 .2 .6 100.0 Total 203 34.2 100.0 Missing System 392 65.8 Total 595 100.0 npdays How often read paper Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 0 zero days 126 21.1 21.9 21.9 1 1 day 52 8.7 9.0 30.8 2 2 days 62 10.4 10.8 41.6 3 3 days 35 5.9 6.1 47.7 4 4 days 24 4.1 4.2 52.0 5 5 days 43 7.3 7.5 59.5 6 6 days 12 2.0 2.1 61.6 7 7 days 221 37.1 38.4 100.0 Total 575 96.6 100.0 Missing 27 Refused 1 .1 33 Dont' know 18 3.1 System 1 .2 Total 20 3.4 Total 595 100.0 tvndays How often watch tv newscast Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 0 zero days 40 6.7 6.8 6.8 1 1 day 18 3.1 3.1 9.9 2 2 days 38 6.3 6.5 16.4 3 3 days 28 4.7 4.8 21.1 4 4 days 16 2.8 2.8 24.0 5 5 days 25 4.3 4.4 28.3 6 6 days 9 1.6 1.6 29.9 7 7 days 409 68.8 70.1 100.0 Total 584 98.2 100.0 Missing 33 Dont' know 9 1.4 System 2 .3 Total 11 1.8 Total 595 100.0 netuse Time spent using the Internet Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 More than an hour a day 240 40.4 40.6 40.6 2 Up to one hour a day 113 19.0 19.0 59.7 3 A few times a week 86 14.5 14.6 74.3 4 A few times a month of less 28 4.8 4.8 79.1 5 Never 121 20.3 20.4 99.5 33 Don't know 3 .5 .5 100.0 Total 592 99.5 100.0 Missing System 3 .5 Total 595 100.0 libcon Liberal or conservative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Far left 13 2.3 2.3 2.3 2 Liberal 91 15.4 15.4 17.7 3 Middle of road 196 33.0 33.1 50.8 4 Conservative 212 35.6 35.8 86.6 5 Far right 22 3.8 3.8 90.4 27 Refused 7 1.1 1.1 91.6 33 Don't know 50 8.4 8.4 100.0 Total 592 99.5 100.0 Missing System 3 .5 Total 595 100.0 regvote Registered to vote? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Yes 518 87.2 88.0 88.0 2 No 66 11.1 11.2 99.3 27 Refused 1 .2 .2 99.4 33 Don't know 3 .6 .6 100.0 Total 589 99.0 100.0 Missing System 6 1.0 Total 595 100.0 oftchrch How often do you go to church? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Never 75 12.7 13.5 13.5 2 Seldom 132 22.3 23.8 37.3 3 Once a month 53 8.9 9.5 46.8 4 Almost every week 116 19.5 20.8 67.6 5 Once a week 181 30.4 32.4 100.0 Total 557 93.7 100.0 Missing 27 Refused 6 1.0 33 Don't know 8 1.3 System 24 4.0 Total 37 6.3 Total 595 100.0 hispanic Are you hispanic? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Yes 17 2.8 3.0 3.0 2 No 535 89.9 94.7 97.7 27 Refused 3 .4 .5 98.1 33 Don't know 11 1.8 1.9 100.0 Total 565 95.0 100.0 Missing System 30 5.0 Total 595 100.0 agecat Age category Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1.00 18-34 165 27.7 29.8 29.8 2.00 35-49 159 26.8 28.8 58.5 3.00 50-64 135 22.8 24.4 83.0 4.00 65 or older 94 15.8 17.0 100.0 Total 554 93.1 100.0 Missing 99 41 6.9 Total 595 100.0 incat Income category Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1.00 Less than 15K 66 11.1 14.6 14.6 2.00 15-25K 47 8.0 10.5 25.1 3.00 25-40K 78 13.2 17.3 42.4 4.00 40-50K 50 8.5 11.2 53.6 5.00 More than 50K 210 35.2 46.4 100.0 Total 451 75.9 100.0 Missing System 143 24.1 Total 595 100.0 intdate INTDATE Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 20090216 83 13.9 14.6 14.6 20090217 58 9.8 10.3 24.9 20090219 58 9.8 10.3 35.3 20090220 95 16.0 16.9 52.2 20090221 24 4.1 4.3 56.5 20090223 45 7.5 7.9 64.4 20090224 47 8.0 8.4 72.8 20090226 63 10.6 11.2 84.0 20090227 68 11.4 12.0 96.0 20090228 22 3.8 4.0 100.0 Total 564 94.8 100.0 Missing System 31 5.2 Total 595 100.0 racecat Race category Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1.00 White 464 78.0 84.7 84.7 2.00 Black 57 9.5 10.4 95.1 3.00 other 27 4.5 4.9 100.0 Total 548 92.1 100.0 Missing 99 47 7.9 Total 595 100.0 edcat Education category Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1.00 H.S. Grad. or less 235 39.5 42.1 42.1 2.00 Some College or Trade 123 20.8 22.1 64.3 3.00 College Grad. to Post Grad 199 33.5 35.7 100.0 Total 558 93.8 100.0 Missing System 37 6.2 Total 595 100.0 metrona Metro Nashville non-Metro dichotomy Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid .00 Non-Metro Nash/Davidson 492 82.8 87.2 87.2 1.00 Metro Nashville-Davidson Co 72 12.2 12.8 100.0 Total 565 95.0 100.0 Missing System 30 5.0 Total 595 100.0 REGION Tennessee region Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1.00 Metro Nashville 72 12.2 12.2 12.2 2.00 Middle Tennessee, Doughnut 100 16.8 16.8 29.0 3.00 Middle Tennessee, Non-Doughnut 90 15.2 15.2 44.2 4.00 Non-Middle Tennessee 332 55.8 55.8 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 division Grand division: East Middle West Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1.00 East 219 36.8 38.8 38.8 2.00 Middle 242 40.7 42.9 81.7 3.00 West 103 17.3 18.3 100.0 Total 564 94.8 100.0 Missing System 31 5.2 Total 595 100.0 faithcat Faith category Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1.00 Southern Baptist 44 7.4 7.6 7.6 2.00 Other Baptist 93 15.6 16.0 23.6 3.00 United Methodist 38 6.3 6.5 30.1 4.00 Churches of Christ 24 4.0 4.1 34.2 5.00 Catholic 30 5.0 5.1 39.3 6.00 Christian Churches 20 3.4 3.5 42.8 98.00 Other mainline 23 3.9 4.0 46.8 99.00 Other Protestant 64 10.8 11.0 57.8 999.00 Unchurched 245 41.2 42.2 100.0 Total 581 97.7 100.0 Missing 27.00 Refused 5 .8 33.00 Don't know 2 .4 System 6 1.1 Total 13 2.3 Total 595 100.0 PARTYAFF PARTY AFFILIATION Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid .00 Strong Democrat 124 20.8 21.3 21.3 1.00 Moderate Democrat 63 10.6 10.9 32.2 2.00 Lean Democrat 48 8.0 8.3 40.5 3.00 Independent no lean 124 20.8 21.3 61.8 4.00 Lean Republican 37 6.3 6.4 68.3 5.00 Moderate Republican 86 14.5 14.8 83.1 6.00 Strong Republican 98 16.5 16.9 100.0 Total 579 97.4 100.0 Missing 99 16 2.6 Total 595 100.0 evanindx Evangelicalism index Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 0 82 13.8 15.2 15.2 1 83 13.9 15.3 30.5 2 87 14.6 16.1 46.7 3 158 26.6 29.3 76.0 4 130 21.8 24.0 100.0 Total 540 90.8 100.0 Missing System 55 9.2 Total 595 100.0 gender Male or female Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Male 282 47.4 50.0 50.0 2 Female 282 47.4 50.0 100.0 Total 564 94.8 100.0 Missing 99 31 5.2 Total 595 100.0 dkk Political knowledge index (max=5) Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 0 58 9.8 9.8 9.8 1 51 8.6 8.6 18.4 2 83 14.0 14.0 32.4 3 110 18.6 18.6 51.0 4 127 21.3 21.3 72.3 5 165 27.7 27.7 100.0 Total 595 100.0 100.0 |