Middle Tennessee Poll, Fall 1998
Summary of Findings
  • Change is good, or at least OK. Less than a quarter of Middle Tennesseans (19%) complain that changes, including population and economic growth, have made Middle Tennessee worse. Most say they have had little effect (39%) or have made life better (37%).


  • Crime is only a "minor" problem. Nearly half of those surveyed (46%) rated crime a minor problem, and more than a third (35%) said it was "hardly any problem." Nearly two-thirds said they were not afraid to walk at night alone within one mile of their home.


  • Clinton should stay in office. More than half (60%) of those surveyed say Clinton should finish his term as president despite the Lewinsky scandal. A little more than a third (35%) say the president should resign. Meanwhile, Middle Tennesseans generally approve of the way the governor, the Legislature, and Nashville’s mayor are handling their jobs.


  • Race relations satisfactory, but one-fourth say Hispanic influx bad. Nearly three-fourths of respondents are very (24%) or somewhat (49%) satisfied with race relations, a figure similar across race groups. More than one-fourth feel that Hispanics have made life here worse.


  • Many feel politically powerless, especially the poorly educated. About half of all Middle Tennesseans (52%) agree at least somewhat that people like themselves have no say in what the government does. The feeling is strongest (58%) among those with a high school education or less.


  • Science, medicine inspire greatest confidence, press and TV the least. More than half say they have a great deal of confidence in the scientific community (52%) and in medicine (51%). Only 13%, however, say they a great deal of confidence in the press, and only 13% say they have a great deal of confidence in television.


  • Middle Tennesseans are mostly healthy and happy. About four out of five (83%) Middle Tennesseans describe their health as either excellent or good. But 11% say they do not have adequate health insurance. About a third (32%) say they are very happy, and nearly two-thirds (61%) report that they are pretty happy.

     
  • Support for free expression rights is mixed. Respondents support personal rights more than media rights. Nearly three-fourths (72%) support the unconditional right to support any candidate for office, but only one-third (33%) support a similar right for news media.
 
Details on Major Findings
Change is good – or at least OK

Changes in Middle Tennessee including economic and population growth have made life better for about a third (37%) of Middle Tennesseans. Another 39% say changes in the region haven’t had much of an effect on life in Middle Tennessee. Less than a quarter (19%) complain that changes in the region have made things worse.

Many Middle Tennesseans credit the region’s changes with improving the standard of living (42%) and with increasing their ability to find a job (56%). About two-thirds (66%), however, complain that changes in the region have made traffic and parking problems worse. The link between changes and worsening traffic problems is significantly stronger among residents of the Nashville metro area (80%) than among residents living in non-metro areas (66%). Most of the region’s residents (60%) say the changes have made little difference in their own neighborhood. Nearly a quarter (23%) say the changes have made life in their neighborhood better, and 12% say the changes have made life in their neighborhood worse.

About one in three Middle Tennesseans (39%) expects the arrival of the Tennessee Oilers professional football team to make life in the region better. Another 41% expect the team’s arrival to make no difference, and 16% say the team will make life in the region worse. Other professional sports teams moving into the region are getting a similar reception. About a third (32%) expect the Predators professional hockey team to make life in the region better, and about a third (31%) expect the Nashville Noise professional women’s basketball team to make life in Middle Tennessee better. 


Crime is only a "minor" problem

Despite the prominence in the media and on the public agenda, crime and violence emerge as only secondary issues for most Middle Tennesseans. Only 18% rate crime as a major problem, while 80% consider crime a minor issue (46%) or hardly any problem at all (35%). Further, on an open-ended question, only 12% mentioned crime as the major problem confronting the area. The leading perceived problem was, in fact, education – cited by 20% of respondents.

The perceived seriousness of crime is best predicted by the number of years someone has resided in Tennessee, with long-term residents (19 years and up) rating crime as a major problem (22%), while only 11% of those who have come more recently agree. Residing in the metropolitan area itself is not a significant predictor of perceptions of the seriousness of crime.

Only about one-third (36%) or respondents say they are afraid to walk at night alone within a mile of their home. But nearly one half (48%) of females are afraid, while one-quarter (25%) of males feel likewise. A full 90% feel safe at home at nights, with more recent residents again feeling safer than those who have been in the area 19 years or more. Impressive majorities say they are only slightly or not at all likely to be victims of a violent crime (84%) or a burglary (81%) within the next week.

Nearly one-fourth (24%) say they feel safer from crime today than a year ago, though about one-third (31%) feel less safe. About two-thirds (66%) expect to feel no more or less safe next year. Nearly two-thirds (62%) say that police are doing an excellent (18%) or good (44%) job. Living in metropolitan or non-metropolitan areas is not a significant predictor of ratings of police performance. 


Clinton should stay in office

President Bill Clinton enjoys solid support in Middle Tennessee despite the scandal involving Monica Lewinsky. A majority of those surveyed (60%) say the president should finish his term despite the scandal. Only about a third (35%) say he should step down. Furthermore, about two out of every three Middle Tennesseans (66%) say they approve of the way Clinton is handling his job as president. Women (73%) are slightly more likely to approve of Clinton’s job performance than are men (62%).

Meanwhile, the scandal appears to be having little effect on the political viability of Middle Tennessee Democrats running for Congress. Only 10% of those surveyed say they consider the scandal a good reason to vote against Democratic candidates for Congress in Middle Tennessee. Most (88%) say they don’t. Support in Middle Tennessee for a presidential bid by Vice President Al Gore appears unaffected as well. Only 14 percent of those surveyed say the scandal would be a good reason to vote against Gore if he ran for president. Most (84%) say the scandal would not be a good reason to vote against Gore.

Most Middle Tennesseans seem pleased with regional and state politicians. Nearly two-thirds (63%) approve of the job Don Sundquist is doing as governor, and better than half (56%) plan to support his bid for another term in office. Less than a third (28 percent) plan to vote for Sundquist’s Democratic challenger, John Jay Hooker. Despite this support, less than a quarter of those surveyed (18%) say Sundquist has talked enough about what they consider the state’s No. 1 problem. Another 54% say he hasn’t, and about a fourth (28%) admit they don’t know whether he has. Meanwhile, more than half of those surveyed (58%) approve of the way the Legislature is handling its job. Nashville Mayor Phil Bredesen, meanwhile, is doing a good job according to about half (55%) of those surveyed. 


Blacks and whites are generally satisfied with race relations

Most respondents are very (24%) or somewhat (49%) satisfied with race relations, and there is no significant difference among race groups in level of satisfaction. Additionally, nearly one third (32%) think relations between the races have improved in the last year, while only about one in five (22%) think they have gotten worse.

Nearly two-thirds (62%) of all respondents think that, if blacks don’t get ahead, it is their own responsibility, though 20% blame racial discrimination. Blacks (33%) are significantly more likely than whites (17%) to fault discrimination. But the age of the respondent is an even better predictor for assigning blame. While only 13% of those 50 and over blame discrimination, nearly a fourth (23%) of those under 50 cite discrimination as the cause. Caution is advisable in contrasting those of different racial groups because the absolute number of nonwhites in the sample is, of course, small.

Where affirmative action is concerned, opinion is divided. While four in ten (40%) say that affirmative action does not give people an unfair advantage, more than a third (36%) feel that it does. Though blacks (58%) are more likely than whites (37%) to say that no unfair advantage is given, gender is an even better predictor than race. A near majority of women (fractionally under 50%) say affirmative action gives no unfair advantage, while only about one-third of men (32%) agree.

A hypothetical affirmative action referendum opposing either discrimination or racial preference did, however, pass by a large majority (80%). Those in higher income categories (89% of those $40,001 and up) are more likely to support the amendment than lower income groups (75%).

A near majority (49%) says they would not mind if a hypothetical teen-age son or daughter dated someone of another race. For blacks, the figure is significantly higher (69%) than for whites (44%). And, among whites, those who arrived in Tennessee in the last 18 years are less likely to mind (59%) than longer-term residents (35%).

In an assessment of opinions about whether recent immigrants have made life better or worse, Mexicans and other Hispanics fare worse than people from the former Soviet bloc or Asians do. More than one-fourth (28%) report that Hispanics have made life worse, but the figure for Russians (4%) and Asians (10%) is far lower. By race, 31% of whites but 13% of blacks and those from other races feel that Hispanics have made life worse.

On the positive side, 20% think Asian immigrants have made life better, while 11% agree that Russians and 15% agree that Hispanics have made life better in the area.

Most Middle Tennesseans report that they live in mixed-race neighborhoods (55%). 


Many feel politically powerless, especially the poorly educated

About half (52%) of Middle Tennesseans agree at least somewhat that people like themselves have no say in what the government does. Most also agree at least somewhat (61%) that what people like themselves think doesn’t matter much to public officials. About one out of every three (35%) at least somewhat agree that people can’t be trusted, and nearly half (48%) agree at least somewhat that the government can’t be trusted. Slightly below half (47%) feel less informed than most people.

Feelings of political powerlessness are most pronounced among those with a high school education or less. More than half (58%) of those surveyed who have a high school degree or less agree at least somewhat that people like themselves have no say in what the government does. Among college graduates surveyed, only 41% agree at least somewhat that they have no say in what the government does.

Similarly, more than a third (68%) of those surveyed who have a high school degree or less agree at least somewhat that what people like themselves think doesn’t matter much to public officials compared to less than half (44%) of those surveyed who have a college degree. More than a third (43%) of those without a high school degree who were surveyed agree at least somewhat that people can’t be trusted compared to less than a quarter (22%) of those surveyed who have a college degree.

The poorly educated and the well-educated, however, appear equally mistrustful of government. Among the high school educated Middle Tennesseans surveyed, 49% agree at least somewhat that they generally mistrust the government compared to 43% of the college-educated Middle Tennesseans surveyed. The difference was not statistically significant. 


Science and medicine inspire the greatest confidence

Among major social institutions, science and medicine inspire the greatest confidence in Middle Tennesseans. More than half (52%) of those surveyed say they have a great deal of confidence in the scientific community. Similarly, 51% say they have a great deal of confidence in medicine. The military inspires a great deal of confidence in slightly less than half (47%) of those surveyed.

Organized religion (33%) and education (28%) occupy the middle range. The press and television, both at 13%, inspire the least confidence.

Among major societal institutions in Middle Tennessee, the country music industry inspires a great deal of confidence in about half (49%) of all Middle Tennesseans. Only about a quarter (25%) express a great deal of confidence in state government. 


Middle Tennesseans are mostly healthy and happy

More than 90% of respondents report being either very happy (32%) or pretty happy (61%) today, and Middle Tennesseans are more optimistic than pessimistic about the future.

The wealthier are dramatically more happy than those with less money. Nearly half (45%) of those with incomes greater than $50,000 report being very happy, while just more than one-fourth of those making $50,000 or below feel likewise.

Fully 40% say they are "pretty well" satisfied with current family finances, and slightly more (42%) report being "more or less satisfied." Here, gender is the better predictor than income. A near majority of males (49%) are satisfied, but only about a third of females (31%) agree. Still, nearly half of females (47%) are more or less satisfied, still leaving more than a fourth (23%) unsatisfied.

Fully 40% of all respondents expect to be better off next year than they are now, while nearly a majority (47%) expects to be the same. Here, those under 50 are more satisfied (59%) than those 50 and older (33%). A majority of respondents (52%) also feel that they are better off today than a year ago. Again, age has an effect, with 50% of those under 50 feeling they are better off, compared to 18% over 50.

About four in five (83%) say they are in excellent or good health – a figure similar to recent national surveys – despite the fact that Tennessee ranks relatively low on other measures of health. But income makes a dramatic difference here: Of those making more than $50,000 per year, 55% describe their health as excellent, while only 30% of those under $50,000 agree. About 11% say they do not have adequate health insurance, and income again is important. Among those making $25,000 per year or under, 17% rate their health insurance as inadequate, a figure that drops to 7% for those making more than $25,000.

Only a tiny minority (5%) expects to be in worse health next year, and 35% expect their health to be better. Age is also important here, with more than half (51%) under 35 expecting to be in better health, but just 20% of those over 50 agreeing. 


Support for free expression rights is mixed

Middle Tennesseans provide greater support for personal than for media rights and greater support for political expression than for offensive or obscene expression.

Nearly three-fourths (72%) of respondents support the right of an individual to speak out at all times in support of any candidate for office. Only one-third (33%), however, support unconditionally a similar right of news media to endorse candidates. More than two-thirds (68%) support the individual right to disagree with the president or other high officials at all times, but less than one-third (29%) support unconditionally the right of journalists to report errors politicians made more than 30 years ago. Still, nearly a majority (47%), would defend the unconditional right of journalists to criticize politicians. Here, as elsewhere, education is an important predictor, with far more college graduates (59%) supporting the right to criticize unconditionally than those who are high school graduates or less (38%).

About one-fourth (26%) would protect the right of the news media to run graphically violent photographs under all circumstances. Just more than a third (35%) would protect source confidentiality unconditionally. Fewer (25%) would protect unconditionally the identification of rape victims. Nearly half (49%) would provide no protection whatever to television stations that project election winners before the polls close.

More than one-third (38%) would provide unconditional protection for selling or publishing books with offensive contents, and only about one in five (21%) would provide no protection for such books. A solid majority (58%) would provide no legal protection whatever for those making offensive gestures in public, indicating that the type of offense is very important to respondents. Flag burning, too, receives scant protection, with nearly two-thirds (62%) willing to provide none.

Protection is far lower for sexually explicit media than for other media. A majority (51%) would provide no protection for recordings featuring drugs, graphic sex, or cults. Nearly two-thirds (58%) would provide no protection for TV when broadcasting graphic sexual acts.

Middle Tennesseans were somewhat more supportive of most expression rights than a national sample surveyed in 1991. Differences in time and survey population, however, may account for differing levels of support.
 

Method and Demographics

This is the first of a series of twice-yearly tracking polls sponsored by Middle Tennessee State University in an effort to paint a continuing statistical portrait of attitudes toward prominent problems and major institutions in Middle Tennessee.

This edition of the Middle Tennessee Poll surveyed, by telephone interview, 621 residents 18 years of age or older from the 39 legally defined Middle Tennessee counties. Interviewers were MTSU students receiving credit as part of their coursework in journalism and mass communication. The poll was conducted between Sept. 28 and Oct. 13. Telephone numbers were generated at random to represent the full range of households in Middle Tennessee. Once a valid number was contacted, interviewers asked to speak to the youngest male at home, or, if no male was available, the oldest female. This is an accepted method of randomizing respondents within households.

The theoretical margin of error for such a poll is ± 4 percentage points 95% of the time. Factors other than the margin of error, however, affect the validity of a poll, including the way questions are phrased and the order in which they are presented. Some questions, identified in the appendices, were asked only to a random half of respondents; there, the theoretical margin of error is larger. Caution is also advisable when interpreting findings about subgroups, which are often represented by their proportion in the population, and, hence, by small numbers. For such subgroups, the margin of error is far higher. This is particularly true for race, where a sizable majority is white (524 subjects in our sample); numbers are far lower for blacks (68) or those of other races (28).

The sample was reasonably representative of the population when judged against 1997 U.S. Census projections for Tennessee. Males made up 47% of the sample, and females 53%, a figure close to Census estimates for Tennessee. For race, 85% of the sample was white, 11% black, and 5% "other." About 4% identified themselves as Hispanic – an ethnic, not a racial, category. The term "black" is used in this report instead of African American because the term is more inclusive.

The Census estimates that 82% of Tennesseans are white and 16% black, but higher percentages of blacks in West Tennessee means that Middle Tennessee is not significantly misrepresented. Age groups are also close to Census estimates except for those 65 and older, projected to comprise 14% of the Tennessee population but accounting for only 9% in our sample.

For education, 44% of our sample were high school graduates or less; 29% had some college or trade school; 27% were college graduates or above. A full 28% had household incomes of more than $50,000, but 12% were under $15,000 and 18% were $15,001-$25,000One fourth (25%) of the sample was from Metropolitan Nashville-Davidson County – a figure close to 1997 Census estimates (28%). However, the eight-county Metropolitan Statistical Area was a bit underrepresented. About 57% of our sample came from the MSA, while census estimates are about 64%. This variation may be accounted for by higher non-cooperation rates in MSA counties as well as sampling error. But, given these rather minor variations, data were not weighted because weighting produces problems of its own.

Frequencies of all
variables for spring 2009 MTSU Poll

mainstat Number one problem facing the state


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent


Valid 1 Health insurance/health services 31 5.3 10.5 10.5



2 Education 28 4.7 9.4 19.9



3 Economy 148 24.9 49.8 69.7



4 Crime 11 1.9 3.8 73.4



5 Taxes 7 1.1 2.2 75.7



6 Government corruption 11 1.8 3.7 79.3



7 Emergency / Disaster readiness 1 .1 .2 79.6



8 Government waste/inefficiency 9 1.5 3.0 82.6



9 Other 23 3.8 7.6 90.2



33 Don't know 29 4.9 9.8 100.0



Total 297 49.9 100.0



Missing System 298 50.1



Total 595 100.0






tengoing Attitude toward 'the way things are going in Tennessee at this time'

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Satisfied 113 18.9 37.9 37.9

2 Dissatisfied 141 23.8 47.6 85.5

27 Refused 1 .2 .4 85.9

33 Don't know/not applicable 42 7.0 14.1 100.0

Total 297 49.9 100.0

Missing System 298 50.1

Total 595 100.0




tennecon Rating of Tennessee's economic conditions today

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Excellent 3 .5 1.0 1.0

2 Good 47 8.0 16.0 17.0

3 Only fair 140 23.6 47.3 64.3

4 Poor 104 17.5 35.0 99.3

33 Refused 2 .4 .7 100.0

Total 297 49.9 100.0

Missing System 298 50.1

Total 595 100.0




mainnat Number one problem facing the nation


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent


Valid 1 War in Iraq and/or Afghanistan 11 1.9 3.7 3.7



2 Economy/jobs 195 32.8 65.5 69.2



3 Gas/heating oil crisis 3 .6 1.1 70.3



4 The president 9 1.4 2.9 73.2



5 Terrorism 2 .3 .6 73.8



6 Moral values/family values 13 2.3 4.5 78.4



7 Poverty/homelessness 4 .6 1.2 79.6



8 Education 1 .2 .4 79.9



9 Other: 43 7.2 14.3 94.3



27 Refused 3 .5 1.1 95.3



33 Don't know 14 2.3 4.7 100.0



Total 298 50.1 100.0



Missing System 297 49.9



Total 595 100.0






natgoing Attitude toward the way things are going in the Nation at this time

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Satisfied 45 7.6 15.2 15.2

2 Dissatisfied 224 37.6 75.1 90.4

27 Refused 1 .2 .3 90.7

33 Don't know 28 4.7 9.3 100.0

Total 298 50.1 100.0

Missing System 297 49.9

Total 595 100.0




natecon Rating of National economic conditions today

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Excellent 3 .5 .9 .9

2 Good 7 1.1 2.3 3.2

3 Only fair 83 13.9 27.7 30.9

4 Poor 203 34.2 68.2 99.1

33 Refused 3 .4 .9 100.0

Total 298 50.1 100.0

Missing System 297 49.9

Total 595 100.0




apgov Approve or disapprove of Bredesen's job performance?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Approve 309 52.0 52.0 52.0

2 Disapprove 137 23.0 23.0 75.1

27 Refused 10 1.7 1.7 76.7

33 Don't know/not applicable 138 23.3 23.3 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0




apleg Approve or disapprove of Legislative leaders' job performance?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Approve 201 33.8 33.8 33.8

2 Disapprove 193 32.4 32.4 66.2

27 Refused 12 2.0 2.0 68.3

33 Don't know/not applicable 189 31.7 31.7 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0




legcntrl Which party would R like to see control Tennessee Legislature?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Democrats 222 37.3 37.3 37.3

2 Republicans 195 32.8 32.8 70.1

27 Refused 15 2.6 2.6 72.7

33 Don't know 163 27.3 27.3 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0




apprez Approve or disapprove of Obama's performance?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Approve 318 53.4 53.4 53.4

2 Disapprove 158 26.6 26.6 80.0

27 Refused 7 1.2 1.2 81.2

33 Don't know/not applicable 112 18.8 18.8 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0




boecon Confidence in Obama administration's ability to improve the economy

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Very confident 152 25.5 25.5 25.5

2 Somewhat confident 196 33.0 33.0 58.5

3 Not too confident 97 16.3 16.3 74.8

4 Not at all confident 109 18.3 18.3 93.1

27 Refused 2 .3 .3 93.4

33 Don't know 39 6.6 6.6 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0




bofgov Confidence in Obama administration's ability to manage the federal government

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Very confident 149 25.0 25.0 25.0

2 Somewhat confident 199 33.5 33.5 58.5

3 Not too confident 89 15.0 15.0 73.5

4 Not at all confident 98 16.5 16.5 90.0

27 Refused 4 .7 .7 90.8

33 Don't know 55 9.2 9.2 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0




boethics Confidence in Obama administration's ethical standards?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 1 Very confident 202 34.0 34.0 34.0

2 2 Somewhat confident 160 26.9 26.9 60.8

3 3 Not too confident 79 13.2 13.2 74.1

4 4 Not at all confident 101 17.0 17.0 91.0

27 r Refused 4 .7 .7 91.7

33 x Don't know 49 8.3 8.3 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0




bofrnrel Confidence in Obama administration's ability to manage American foreign policy?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Very confident 156 26.2 26.2 26.2

2 Somewhat confident 183 30.8 30.8 57.0

3 Not too confident 91 15.4 15.4 72.4

4 Not at all confident 98 16.4 16.4 88.8

27 Refused 4 .7 .7 89.5

33 Don't know 63 10.5 10.5 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0




obamcoop Is Obama doing enough to cooperate with Republicans in Congress?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Yes, doing enough 322 54.2 54.2 54.2

2 No, not doing enough 174 29.3 29.3 83.5

27 Refused 6 1.1 1.1 84.6

33 Don't know 91 15.4 15.4 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0




repcoop Are Republicans in Congress doing enough to cooperate with Obama?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Yes, doing enough 143 24.0 24.0 24.0

2 No, not doing enough 349 58.7 58.7 82.7

27 Refused 9 1.5 1.5 84.2

33 Don't know 94 15.8 15.8 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0




rechurt Has this recession hurt you financially?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Yes 390 65.6 65.6 65.6

2 No 187 31.4 31.4 97.0

33 Don't know 18 3.0 3.0 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0




howhurt IF RECESSION HAS HURT: A great deal, or somewhat?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 A great deal 205 34.4 52.4 52.4

2 Only somewhat 180 30.3 46.2 98.6

33 Don't know 5 .9 1.4 100.0

Total 390 65.6 100.0

Missing System 205 34.4

Total 595 100.0




worrynat How worried about nation's economy over next few years?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Very worried 246 41.4 41.4 41.4

2 Somewhat worried 233 39.1 39.1 80.6

3 Not too worried 72 12.1 12.1 92.6

4 Not worried at all 37 6.3 6.3 98.9

27 Refused 2 .3 .3 99.2

33 Don't know 5 .8 .8 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0




worryfam How worried about own family's financial situation over next few years?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Very worried 140 23.6 23.6 23.6

2 Somewhat worried 237 39.9 39.9 63.5

3 Not too worried 142 23.8 23.8 87.4

4 Not worried at all 71 11.9 11.9 99.3

27 Refused 2 .4 .4 99.7

33 Don't know 2 .3 .3 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0




irqhowgo How are things going for the U.S. in Iraq?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Very well 67 11.3 12.4 12.4

2 Moderately well 260 43.7 48.0 60.4

3 Moderately badly 138 23.3 25.5 85.9

4 Very badly 76 12.8 14.1 100.0

Total 542 91.2 100.0

Missing 27 Refused 3 .5

33 Don't know 50 8.4

Total 53 8.8

Total 595 100.0




irqmstk Was sending troops to Iraq a mistake, or not?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Was a mistake 317 53.3 53.3 53.3

2 Was not a mistake 228 38.3 38.3 91.6

27 Refused 8 1.3 1.3 92.9

33 Don't know 42 7.1 7.1 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0




ojkme Own opinion of jokes that refer to Obama's race

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Definitely humorous 20 3.4 3.4 3.4

2 Probably humorous 73 12.2 12.2 15.6

3 Probably not humorous 124 20.9 20.9 36.5

4 Definitely not humorous 331 55.7 55.7 92.2

27 Refused 8 1.4 1.4 93.6

33 Don't know 38 6.4 6.4 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0




ojkoth Perception of most others' opinion of jokes that refer to Obama's race

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Definitely humorous 29 4.9 4.9 4.9

2 Probably humorous 154 26.0 26.0 30.8

3 Probably not humorous 177 29.8 29.8 60.6

4 Definitely not humorous 145 24.4 24.4 85.0

27 Refused 8 1.3 1.3 86.3

33 Don't know 82 13.7 13.7 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0




joktell Number of occasions one has told a joke about Obama's race

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 0 482 81.0 84.8 84.8

1 15 2.6 2.7 87.5

2 17 2.9 3.1 90.6

3 15 2.5 2.7 93.2

4 4 .6 .6 93.9

5 12 2.1 2.2 96.1

6 6 .9 1.0 97.0

8 2 .3 .4 97.4

10 5 .9 .9 98.3

15 3 .5 .5 98.9

20 3 .5 .5 99.4

30 2 .3 .3 99.7

48 1 .2 .2 99.9

500 1 .1 .1 100.0

Total 568 95.6 100.0

Missing 999 No answer 26 4.4

Total 595 100.0




sptncare State spending on TennCare

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Too little 224 37.6 37.6 37.6

2 About right 157 26.3 26.3 64.0

3 Too much 112 18.8 18.8 82.8

27 Refused 4 .7 .7 83.5

33 Don't know 98 16.5 16.5 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0




spwelfar State spending on Welfare

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Too little 152 25.6 25.6 25.6

2 About right 139 23.3 23.3 48.9

3 Too much 179 30.1 30.1 79.0

27 Refused 7 1.2 1.2 80.2

33 Don't know 118 19.8 19.8 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0




spunivs State spending on universities

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Too little 306 51.4 51.4 51.4

2 About right 128 21.5 21.5 73.0

3 Too much 63 10.6 10.6 83.6

27 Refused 4 .6 .6 84.2

33 Don't know 94 15.8 15.8 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0




spcoltek State spending on community colleges and technical schools

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Too little 324 54.4 54.4 54.4

2 About right 141 23.7 23.7 78.2

3 Too much 23 3.9 3.9 82.1

27 Refused 4 .7 .7 82.8

33 Don't know 102 17.2 17.2 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0




sphwyrep State spending on highway maintenance

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Too little 210 35.3 35.3 35.3

2 About right 221 37.1 37.1 72.4

3 Too much 98 16.4 16.4 88.8

27 Refused 5 .8 .8 89.7

33 Don't know 62 10.3 10.3 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0




sphwybld State spending on highway construction

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Too little 147 24.8 24.8 24.8

2 About right 223 37.5 37.5 62.3

3 Too much 115 19.4 19.4 81.7

27 Refused 7 1.2 1.2 82.8

33 Don't know 102 17.2 17.2 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0




spenviro State spending on the environment

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Too little 292 49.1 49.1 49.1

2 About right 151 25.4 25.4 74.5

3 Too much 59 10.0 10.0 84.5

27 Refused 7 1.2 1.2 85.6

33 Don't know 86 14.4 14.4 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0




sphseduc State spending on elementary and secondary education

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Too little 371 62.4 62.4 62.4

2 About right 137 23.1 23.1 85.5

3 Too much 30 5.0 5.0 90.5

27 Refused 4 .7 .7 91.2

33 Don't know 52 8.8 8.8 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0




splawenf State spending on law enforcement agencies

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Too little 235 39.5 39.5 39.5

2 About right 187 31.4 31.4 70.9

3 Too much 69 11.7 11.7 82.6

27 Refused 8 1.3 1.3 83.9

33 Don't know 96 16.1 16.1 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0




sphcappd State spending on programs for handicapped

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Too little 281 47.3 47.3 47.3

2 About right 154 25.9 25.9 73.1

3 Too much 13 2.1 2.1 75.3

27 Refused 4 .6 .6 75.9

33 Don't know 143 24.1 24.1 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0




sprtrded State spending on programs for mentally retarded

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Too little 281 47.3 47.3 47.3

2 About right 127 21.3 21.3 68.6

3 Too much 10 1.7 1.7 70.3

27 Refused 5 .9 .9 71.3

33 Don't know 171 28.7 28.7 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0




spfoster State spending on foster care services

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Too little 259 43.5 43.5 43.5

2 About right 106 17.9 17.9 61.4

3 Too much 13 2.2 2.2 63.5

27 Refused 11 1.8 1.8 65.4

33 Don't know 206 34.6 34.6 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0




spmhelth State spending on mental health

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Too little 261 43.9 43.9 43.9

2 About right 136 22.9 22.9 66.8

3 Too much 16 2.7 2.7 69.5

27 Refused 5 .8 .8 70.3

33 Don't know 176 29.7 29.7 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0




spmtrans State spending on mass transit

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Too little 263 44.2 44.2 44.2

2 About right 157 26.4 26.4 70.6

3 Too much 51 8.6 8.6 79.1

27 Refused 5 .9 .9 80.0

33 Don't know 119 20.0 20.0 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0




taxsplit Key to tax question split


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent


Valid 1 Ban, then introduce with sales tax cut 291 49.0 49.0 49.0



2 Introduce with sales tax cut, then ban 303 51.0 51.0 100.0



Total 595 100.0 100.0






tntaxes1 Preferred action on state income tax. Choice order: ban / enact with sales tax cut


Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent


Valid 1.0 Amend constitution to forbid income tax 124 20.9 42.6
42.6


2.0 Lower sales taxes by introducing an income tax 133 22.4 45.6
88.2


27.0 Refused 1 .2 .5
88.7


33.0 Don't know 33 5.6 11.3
100.0


Total 291 49.0 100.0



Missing System 303 51.0



Total 595 100.0






tntaxes2 Preferred action on state income tax - Choice order: enact with sales tax cut /
ban


Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent


Valid 1 Lower sales taxes by introducing an income tax 102 17.1 33.6
33.6


2 Amend constitution to forbid income tax 147 24.7 48.5
82.1


27 Refused 8 1.3 2.5
84.6


33 Don't know 47 7.8 15.4
100.0


Total 303 51.0 100.0



Missing System 291 49.0



Total 595 100.0






sellwine Favor or oppose letting grocery stores sell wine?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Favor 367 61.7 61.7 61.7

2 Oppose 155 26.0 26.0 87.8

27 Refused 3 .6 .6 88.3

33 Don't know 69 11.7 11.7 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0




aborlegl Do you think abortion should be legal under any circumstances, legal only under
certain circumstances, or illegal in all


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent


Valid 1 1 Legal under any circumstances 110 18.5 18.5 18.5



2 2 Legal under certain circumstances 308 51.8 51.8 70.3



3 3 Illegal in all circumstances 151 25.4 25.4 95.7



27 r Refused 9 1.5 1.5 97.2



33 x Don't know 17 2.8 2.8 100.0



Total 595 100.0 100.0






spgrpkey Key to spiral of silence group rotation

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Strangers 169 28.4 28.4 28.4

2 Friends 209 35.2 35.2 63.6

3 Family 217 36.4 36.4 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0




willing_climate Spiral of silence question order key: Willingness, then climate

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid .00 False 268 45.0 45.0 45.0

1.00 True 327 55.0 55.0 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0




genspeak Willingness to speak out among: [STRANGERS, FRIENDS, FAMILY]

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid .00 Least willing 76 12.7 12.8 12.8

1 45 7.6 7.6 20.4

2 38 6.4 6.4 26.8

3 105 17.6 17.6 44.5

4.00 Most willing 329 55.4 55.5 100.0

Total 593 99.7 100.0

Missing System 2 .3

Total 595 100.0




CURRENT_CLIMATE Opinion climate right now among whatever social group R was asked about

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1.00 Congruent 309 51.9 51.9 51.9

2.00 Incongruent 119 20.0 20.0 72.0

3.00 Evenly divided 119 20.1 20.1 92.1

27.00 Refused 1 .1 .1 92.2

33.00 Don't know 47 7.8 7.8 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0




CONGRUENT_NOW Congruent now with social group R was asked about?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid .00 No 286 48.1 48.1 48.1

1.00 Yes 309 51.9 51.9 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0




future_climate Future opinion climate among whatever social group R was asked about

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1.00 Congruent 294 49.5 49.5 49.5

2.00 Incongruent 143 24.1 24.1 73.5

3.00 Evenly divided 99 16.7 16.7 90.2

27.00 Refused 1 .1 .1 90.3

33.00 Don't know 58 9.7 9.7 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0




CONGRUENT_FUTURE Congruent in future with social group R was asked about?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid .00 No 301 50.5 50.5 50.5

1.00 Yes 294 49.5 49.5 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0




OPACCEPT Likelihood that (STRANGERS, FRIENDS, FAMILY) would accept R's opinion

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid .00 Very unlikely 82 13.8 13.9 13.9

1 63 10.7 10.7 24.6

2.00 Don't know 65 11.0 11.0 35.7

3 109 18.4 18.6 54.2

4.00 Very likely 270 45.4 45.8 100.0

Total 590 99.2 100.0

Missing System 5 .8

Total 595 100.0




OPHARM Likelihood of harm to relationship with (STRANGERS, FRIENDS, FAMILY)

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid .00 Very unlikely 326 54.8 55.4 55.4

1 78 13.1 13.2 68.7

2.00 Don't know 68 11.5 11.6 80.3

3 43 7.2 7.3 87.6

4.00 Very likely 73 12.3 12.4 100.0

Total 588 98.9 100.0

Missing System 7 1.1

Total 595 100.0




friends Asked about friends?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid .00 No 386 64.8 64.8 64.8

1.00 Yes 209 35.2 35.2 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0




family Asked about family?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid .00 No 378 63.6 63.6 63.6

1.00 Yes 217 36.4 36.4 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0




fear_isolation Fear of isolation (7 = most fearful)

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 0 74 12.5 12.5 12.5

1 77 12.9 12.9 25.4

2 103 17.4 17.4 42.8

3 127 21.3 21.3 64.1

4 134 22.5 22.5 86.6

5 57 9.5 9.5 96.2

6 21 3.6 3.6 99.7

7 2 .3 .3 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0




pucog1pa Spiral of silence experiment component variable

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 27 4.6 34.7 34.7

2 17 2.9 22.2 56.9

3 24 4.0 30.1 87.0

33 10 1.7 13.0 100.0

Total 78 13.1 100.0

Missing System 517 86.9

Total 595 100.0




pufog1pa Spiral of silence experiment component variable

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 24 4.0 30.2 30.2

2 22 3.6 27.7 57.9

3 22 3.8 28.7 86.6

33 10 1.8 13.4 100.0

Total 78 13.1 100.0

Missing System 517 86.9

Total 595 100.0




putog1pa Spiral of silence experiment component variable

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 15 2.6 19.5 19.5

2 21 3.6 27.3 46.8

3 14 2.3 17.5 64.2

4 10 1.6 12.2 76.4

27 1 .2 1.3 77.7

33 17 2.9 22.3 100.0

Total 78 13.1 100.0

Missing System 517 86.9

Total 595 100.0




puhog1pa Spiral of silence experiment component variable

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 13 2.2 16.5 16.5

2 16 2.6 20.2 36.7

3 17 2.9 22.2 58.9

4 13 2.3 17.2 76.1

27 1 .2 1.3 77.4

33 18 3.0 22.6 100.0

Total 78 13.1 100.0

Missing System 517 86.9

Total 595 100.0




strngrg1 Spiral of silence experiment component variable

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 60 10.1 35.6 35.6

2 34 5.7 20.1 55.7

3 23 3.9 13.9 69.6

4 37 6.2 21.8 91.4

33 15 2.4 8.6 100.0

Total 169 28.4 100.0

Missing System 426 71.6

Total 595 100.0




pucog1pb Spiral of silence experiment component variable

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 28 4.7 30.9 30.9

2 24 4.0 26.3 57.2

3 28 4.7 30.5 87.7

33 11 1.9 12.3 100.0

Total 91 15.3 100.0

Missing System 504 84.7

Total 595 100.0




pufog1pb Spiral of silence experiment component variable

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 25 4.3 27.9 27.9

2 30 5.0 32.4 60.4

3 25 4.2 27.3 87.7

33 11 1.9 12.3 100.0

Total 91 15.3 100.0

Missing System 504 84.7

Total 595 100.0




putog1pb Spiral of silence experiment component variable

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 15 2.5 16.2 16.2

2 26 4.3 28.3 44.4

3 17 2.9 18.9 63.3

4 15 2.5 16.4 79.7

27 2 .3 2.2 81.9

33 16 2.8 18.1 100.0

Total 91 15.3 100.0

Missing System 504 84.7

Total 595 100.0




puhog1pb Spiral of silence experiment component variable

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 13 2.2 14.2 14.2

2 14 2.3 14.9 29.1

3 18 3.0 19.4 48.5

4 21 3.6 23.5 72.0

27 3 .5 3.6 75.5

33 22 3.7 24.5 100.0

Total 91 15.3 100.0

Missing System 504 84.7

Total 595 100.0




frcog2pa Spiral of silence experiment component variable

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 53 8.9 54.8 54.8

2 20 3.4 21.4 76.2

3 18 3.1 18.9 95.1

33 5 .8 4.9 100.0

Total 96 16.1 100.0

Missing System 499 83.9

Total 595 100.0




frfog2pa Spiral of silence experiment component variable

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 53 8.9 55.4 55.4

2 21 3.5 22.0 77.4

3 13 2.1 13.3 90.6

33 9 1.5 9.4 100.0

Total 96 16.1 100.0

Missing System 499 83.9

Total 595 100.0




frtog2pa Spiral of silence experiment component variable

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 45 7.5 46.5 46.5

2 18 3.0 18.3 64.9

3 10 1.7 10.8 75.6

4 15 2.4 15.2 90.8

33 9 1.5 9.2 100.0

Total 96 16.1 100.0

Missing System 499 83.9

Total 595 100.0




frhog2pa Spiral of silence experiment component variable

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 11 1.9 11.7 11.7

2 2 .3 2.1 13.8

3 13 2.2 13.6 27.4

4 63 10.5 65.3 92.7

27 1 .1 .6 93.3

33 6 1.1 6.7 100.0

Total 96 16.1 100.0

Missing System 499 83.9

Total 595 100.0




frendsg2 Spiral of silence experiment component variable

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 138 23.3 66.2 66.2

2 34 5.7 16.2 82.5

3 4 .7 2.1 84.5

4 18 3.0 8.6 93.2

27 1 .2 .6 93.8

33 13 2.2 6.2 100.0

Total 209 35.2 100.0

Missing System 386 64.8

Total 595 100.0




frcog2pb Spiral of silence experiment component variable

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 56 9.4 49.4 49.4

2 29 4.9 25.6 75.0

3 23 3.8 20.1 95.1

27 1 .1 .6 95.7

33 5 .8 4.3 100.0

Total 113 19.0 100.0

Missing System 482 81.0

Total 595 100.0




frfog2pb Spiral of silence experiment component variable

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 50 8.3 43.9 43.9

2 34 5.7 30.1 74.0

3 23 3.8 19.9 93.9

27 1 .1 .6 94.6

33 6 1.0 5.4 100.0

Total 113 19.0 100.0

Missing System 482 81.0

Total 595 100.0




frtog2pb Spiral of silence experiment component variable

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 60 10.0 52.7 52.7

2 20 3.3 17.6 70.2

3 9 1.6 8.2 78.4

4 16 2.6 13.8 92.2

27 1 .1 .6 92.9

33 8 1.4 7.1 100.0

Total 113 19.0 100.0

Missing System 482 81.0

Total 595 100.0




frhog2pb Spiral of silence experiment component variable

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 13 2.2 11.4 11.4

2 5 .9 4.8 16.2

3 14 2.4 12.6 28.9

4 72 12.1 63.8 92.7

27 1 .1 .6 93.3

33 8 1.3 6.7 100.0

Total 113 19.0 100.0

Missing System 482 81.0

Total 595 100.0




facog3pa Spiral of silence experiment component variable

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 63 10.6 67.2 67.2

2 11 1.8 11.7 78.9

3 13 2.1 13.5 92.3

33 7 1.2 7.7 100.0

Total 93 15.7 100.0

Missing System 501 84.3

Total 595 100.0




fafog3pa Spiral of silence experiment component variable

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 57 9.6 60.8 60.8

2 19 3.1 19.9 80.8

3 10 1.6 10.3 91.1

33 8 1.4 8.9 100.0

Total 93 15.7 100.0

Missing System 501 84.3

Total 595 100.0




fatog3pa Spiral of silence experiment component variable

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 55 9.3 59.3 59.3

2 11 1.9 11.9 71.2

3 6 1.1 6.8 78.0

4 14 2.4 15.0 93.0

27 1 .1 .7 93.7

33 6 1.0 6.3 100.0

Total 93 15.7 100.0

Missing System 501 84.3

Total 595 100.0




fahog3pa Spiral of silence experiment component variable

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 8 1.3 8.5 8.5

2 3 .5 3.4 11.8

3 8 1.4 8.9 20.7

4 68 11.4 72.5 93.2

27 1 .1 .7 93.9

33 6 1.0 6.1 100.0

Total 93 15.7 100.0

Missing System 501 84.3

Total 595 100.0




familyg3 Spiral of silence experiment component variable

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 131 22.0 60.3 60.3

2 37 6.2 16.9 77.2

3 17 2.9 8.0 85.3

4 21 3.5 9.6 94.9

27 1 .1 .3 95.2

33 10 1.8 4.8 100.0

Total 217 36.4 100.0

Missing System 378 63.6

Total 595 100.0




facog3pb Spiral of silence experiment component variable

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 82 13.8 66.9 66.9

2 18 3.0 14.3 81.2

3 15 2.5 11.9 93.1

33 9 1.4 6.9 100.0

Total 123 20.7 100.0

Missing System 472 79.3

Total 595 100.0




fafog3pb Spiral of silence experiment component variable

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 85 14.4 69.5 69.5

2 18 3.1 14.7 84.2

3 7 1.2 5.6 89.8

33 13 2.1 10.2 100.0

Total 123 20.7 100.0

Missing System 472 79.3

Total 595 100.0




fatog3pb Spiral of silence experiment component variable

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 80 13.5 65.4 65.4

2 14 2.3 11.2 76.6

3 7 1.1 5.4 82.0

4 13 2.2 10.7 92.6

27 1 .1 .5 93.1

33 9 1.4 6.9 100.0

Total 123 20.7 100.0

Missing System 472 79.3

Total 595 100.0




fahog3pb Spiral of silence experiment component variable

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 15 2.6 12.4 12.4

2 3 .5 2.4 14.8

3 7 1.2 5.8 20.5

4 89 14.9 72.0 92.5

27 1 .1 .5 93.0

33 9 1.4 7.0 100.0

Total 123 20.7 100.0

Missing System 472 79.3

Total 595 100.0




partyid Political party

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Republican 184 30.9 31.1 31.1

2 Democrat 187 31.5 31.7 62.7

3 Independent 146 24.5 24.7 87.4

4 Other 48 8.0 8.1 95.5

27 Refused 9 1.6 1.6 97.0

33 Don't know 18 2.9 3.0 100.0

Total 592 99.5 100.0

Missing System 3 .5

Total 595 100.0




stronrep Strong republican

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Strong 98 16.5 53.3 53.3

2 Not very strong 83 14.0 45.2 98.4

33 Don't know 3 .5 1.6 100.0

Total 184 30.9 100.0

Missing System 411 69.1

Total 595 100.0




strondem Strong democrat

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Strong 124 20.8 65.9 65.9

2 Not very strong 59 10.0 31.7 97.6

27 Refused 1 .1 .3 97.9

33 Don't know 4 .7 2.1 100.0

Total 187 31.5 100.0

Missing System 407 68.5

Total 595 100.0




indlean Close to republican or democrat?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Closer to Republican 48 8.0 33.2 33.2

2 Closer to Democrat 37 6.3 25.8 59.0

3 Neither 58 9.7 40.0 99.1

27 Refused 1 .1 .5 99.6

33 Don't know 1 .1 .4 100.0

Total 144 24.2 100.0

Missing System 451 75.8

Total 595 100.0




whovote4 Who vote for in 2008 presidential race?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Obama 195 32.7 33.1 33.1

2 McCain 214 35.9 36.3 69.4

3 Someone else 25 4.2 4.2 73.6

4 Didn't vote 108 18.1 18.3 91.9

27 Refused 36 6.0 6.1 98.0

33 Don't know 12 2.0 2.0 100.0

Total 589 99.0 100.0

Missing System 6 1.0

Total 595 100.0




edletter [Have you ...] Written a letter to a newspaper, magazine or television news
program?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 1 Yes 95 15.9 16.2 16.2

2 2 No 487 81.9 83.0 99.1

27 r Refused 3 .5 .5 99.7

33 x Don't know 2 .3 .3 100.0

Total 587 98.7 100.0

Missing System 8 1.3

Total 595 100.0




calledin [Have you ...] Called in to a radio or television talk show?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 1 Yes 89 14.9 15.1 15.1

2 2 No 494 83.0 84.0 99.1

27 r Refused 3 .5 .5 99.7

33 x Don't know 2 .3 .3 100.0

Total 588 98.8 100.0

Missing System 7 1.2

Total 595 100.0




contcand [Have you ...] Contacted a candidate for public office or an elected official?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 1 Yes 203 34.1 34.5 34.5

2 2 No 379 63.7 64.4 98.9

27 r Refused 2 .3 .3 99.2

33 x Don't know 5 .8 .8 100.0

Total 588 98.8 100.0

Missing System 7 1.2

Total 595 100.0




gotomeet [Have you ...] Attended a public meeting of an organization interested in public
affairs?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 1 Yes 192 32.3 32.6 32.6

2 2 No 388 65.3 66.0 98.7

27 r Refused 3 .5 .5 99.2

33 x Don't know 5 .8 .8 100.0

Total 588 98.8 100.0

Missing System 7 1.2

Total 595 100.0




talkmeet [Have you ...] Spoken out at a public meeting of an organization interested in
public affairs?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 1 Yes 103 17.3 17.5 17.5

2 2 No 477 80.2 81.3 98.8

27 r Refused 3 .5 .5 99.3

33 x Don't know 4 .7 .7 100.0

Total 587 98.7 100.0

Missing System 8 1.3

Total 595 100.0




protest [Have you ...] Taken part in a public demonstration or march?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 1 Yes 55 9.2 9.4 9.4

2 2 No 525 88.3 89.5 98.9

27 r Refused 3 .5 .5 99.4

33 x Don't know 4 .6 .6 100.0

Total 587 98.7 100.0

Missing System 8 1.3

Total 595 100.0




workcamp [Have you ...] Worked in a political campaign?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 1 Yes 68 11.5 11.6 11.6

2 2 No 514 86.5 87.5 99.1

27 r Refused 3 .5 .5 99.7

33 x Don't know 2 .3 .3 100.0

Total 588 98.8 100.0

Missing System 7 1.2

Total 595 100.0




uptodate How often follow what's going on in government and public affairs?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Hardly at all 43 7.2 7.3 7.3

2 Only now and then 71 11.9 12.1 19.4

3 Some of the time 155 26.0 26.4 45.8

4 Most of the time 310 52.1 52.9 98.6

27 Refused 3 .5 .5 99.2

33 Don't know 5 .8 .8 100.0

Total 586 98.5 100.0

Missing System 9 1.5

Total 595 100.0




veep What job does Joe Biden hold?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Vice president 457 76.9 79.0 79.0

2 Any incorrect answer 12 2.1 2.1 81.1

27 Refused 4 .7 .8 81.9

33 Don't know 105 17.6 18.1 100.0

Total 579 97.3 100.0

Missing System 16 2.7

Total 595 100.0




jdreview Who determines whether a law is constitutional?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Supreme Court 406 68.4 70.4 70.4

2 Any incorrect answer 88 14.8 15.3 85.6

27 Refused 4 .6 .6 86.3

33 Don't know 79 13.4 13.7 100.0

Total 578 97.1 100.0

Missing System 17 2.9

Total 595 100.0




twothrds How much of a majority required to override a veto?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Two-thirds 254 42.7 43.9 43.9

2 Any incorrect answer 82 13.7 14.1 58.0

27 Refused 4 .6 .6 58.7

33 Don't know 239 40.2 41.3 100.0

Total 578 97.1 100.0

Missing System 17 2.9

Total 595 100.0




housmaj Which party holds a majority in the U.S. House of Representatives?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Democrat 412 69.4 71.5 71.5

2 Any incorrect answer 56 9.4 9.7 81.2

27 Refused 6 1.0 1.0 82.3

33 Don't know 102 17.2 17.7 100.0

Total 577 97.0 100.0

Missing System 18 3.0

Total 595 100.0




conparty Which party is more conservative than the other?


Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent


Valid 1 Republican 350 58.8 60.7 60.7



2 2 No, both parties are equally conservative 71 11.9 12.3 73.0



3 Any incorrect answer besides "No" 58 9.8 10.1 83.0



27 Refused 7 1.3 1.3 84.3



33 Don't know 90 15.2 15.7
100.0


Total 577 97.0 100.0



Missing System 18 3.0



Total 595 100.0






isolwory "I worry about being isolated if people disagree with me."

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 True 41 6.9 7.2 7.2

2 Not true 515 86.6 89.9 97.1

27 Refused 3 .5 .5 97.7

33 Don't know 13 2.2 2.3 100.0

Total 573 96.3 100.0

Missing System 22 3.7

Total 595 100.0




avoid "I don't worry about other people avoiding me."

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 True 350 58.8 61.1 61.1

2 Not true 203 34.1 35.4 96.5

27 Refused 3 .6 .6 97.0

33 Don't know 17 2.9 3.0 100.0

Total 573 96.3 100.0

Missing System 22 3.7

Total 595 100.0




tell "I avoid telling other people what I think when there's a risk they would avoid me if
they knew my opinion

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 1 True 101 16.9 17.6 17.6

2 2 Not true 429 72.2 74.9 92.5

27 r Refused 4 .7 .7 93.2

33 x Don't know 39 6.5 6.8 100.0

Total 573 96.3 100.0

Missing System 22 3.7

Total 595 100.0




dodgargu "I enjoy avoiding arguments."

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 1 True 315 52.9 55.1 55.1

2 2 Not true 205 34.5 35.9 90.9

27 r Refused 5 .9 1.0 91.9

33 x Don't know 46 7.8 8.1 100.0

Total 572 96.1 100.0

Missing System 23 3.9

Total 595 100.0




argintel "Arguing over controversial issues improves my intelligence."

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 1 True 234 39.3 40.7 40.7

2 2 Not true 286 48.1 49.9 90.6

27 r Refused 4 .6 .7 91.3

33 x Don't know 50 8.4 8.7 100.0

Total 574 96.5 100.0

Missing System 21 3.5

Total 595 100.0




enjargue "I enjoy a good argument over a controversial issue."

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 1 True 293 49.3 51.2 51.2

2 2 Not true 254 42.7 44.3 95.6

27 r Refused 2 .3 .3 95.9

33 x Don't know 23 3.9 4.1 100.0

Total 573 96.3 100.0

Missing System 22 3.7

Total 595 100.0




avargue "I try to avoid getting into arguments."

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 1 True 422 71.0 73.7 73.7

2 2 Not true 129 21.6 22.4 96.2

27 r Refused 3 .4 .4 96.6

33 x Don't know 19 3.2 3.4 100.0

Total 573 96.3 100.0

Missing System 22 3.7

Total 595 100.0




reborn Are you born again?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Yes 340 57.2 65.6 65.6

2 No 178 30.0 34.4 100.0

Total 518 87.2 100.0

Missing 27 Refused 6 1.1

33 Don't know 44 7.4

System 26 4.4

Total 76 12.8

Total 595 100.0




savesoul Ever evangelized?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Yes 389 65.5 70.0 70.0

2 No 167 28.1 30.0 100.0

Total 556 93.5 100.0

Missing 27 Refused 4 .7

33 Don't know 5 .9

System 29 4.9

Total 38 6.5

Total 595 100.0




rapture Believe in the "Rapture"?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Yes 321 54.0 64.8 64.8

2 No 174 29.3 35.2 100.0

Total 496 83.3 100.0

Missing 27 Refused 16 2.6

33 Don't know 54 9.2

System 29 4.9

Total 99 16.7

Total 595 100.0




bible View of the Bible


Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent


Valid 1 Literal word of God 225 37.8 39.8 39.8



2 Inspired, but not literal, word of God 265 44.5 46.9 86.6



3 Book of fables, etc., recorded by men 50 8.4 8.8 95.5



12 1 .1 .1 95.6



99 Refused or don't know 25 4.2 4.4 100.0



Total 565 95.0 100.0



Missing System 30 5.0



Total 595 100.0






educ Last school year completed

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 2 Elementary 11 1.8 1.9 1.9

3 Some high school 52 8.7 9.3 11.2

4 High school grad 172 29.0 30.9 42.1

5 Some trade 17 2.9 3.0 45.2

6 Some college 106 17.9 19.1 64.3

7 College grad 135 22.7 24.2 88.5

8 Some graduate study 14 2.3 2.5 91.0

9 Master's 40 6.8 7.2 98.2

10 Doctorate 10 1.7 1.8 100.0

Total 558 93.8 100.0

Missing 27 Refused 3 .6

33 Don't know 4 .6

System 30 5.0

Total 37 6.2

Total 595 100.0




race What race are you?


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent


Valid 1 White 464 78.0 82.2 82.2



2 Black or African-American 57 9.5 10.0 92.2



3 Asian or Pacific Islander 2 .3 .4 92.6



4 Native American or Alaskan Native 5 .9 .9 93.5



5 Other 20 3.3 3.5 97.0



27 Refused/not applicable (volunteered) 7 1.2 1.2 98.2



33 Don't know/no opinion (volunteered) 10 1.7 1.8 100.0



Total 565 95.0 100.0



Missing System 30 5.0



Total 595 100.0






income What is your income level?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 10,000 or less 35 5.8 7.7 7.7

2 10,001 to 15,000 31 5.2 6.9 14.6

3 15,001 to 20,000 20 3.3 4.4 18.9

4 20,001 to 25,000 28 4.7 6.1 25.1

5 25,001 to 30,000 33 5.5 7.3 32.4

6 30,001 to 35,000 22 3.7 4.8 37.2

7 35,001 to 40,000 23 3.9 5.2 42.4

8 40,001 to 45,000 27 4.5 5.9 48.3

9 45,001 to 50,000 24 4.0 5.2 53.6

10 50,001 to 75,000 73 12.2 16.1 69.7

11 75,001 to 99,999 67 11.3 14.8 84.5

12 100,000 or more 70 11.7 15.5 100.0

Total 451 75.9 100.0

Missing 27 Refused/not applicable 80 13.5

33 Dont know/no opinion 32 5.4

System 31 5.2

Total 143 24.1

Total 595 100.0




areacodx AREACODX

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 0 96 16.2 17.1 17.1

423 135 22.6 23.9 41.0

615 65 11.0 11.6 52.6

731 51 8.6 9.1 61.7

865 76 12.7 13.4 75.1

901 51 8.5 9.0 84.1

931 90 15.1 15.9 100.0

Total 564 94.8 100.0

Missing System 31 5.2

Total 595 100.0




msacod Census Bureau Metropolitan Area


Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent


Valid 0 Non-MSA 202 34.0 35.9
35.9


1560 Chattanooga, TN-GA MSA 35 5.8 6.2
42.0


1660 Clarksville-Hopkinsville, TN-KY MSA 19 3.2 3.4
45.4


3580 Jackson, TN MSA 6 1.1 1.1
46.5


3660 Johnson City-Kingsport-Bristol, TN-VA MSA 31 5.3 5.5
52.1


3840 Knoxville, TN MSA 61 10.3 10.8
62.9


4920 Memphis, TN-AR-MS MSA 51 8.5 9.0
71.9


5360 Nashville, TN MSA 159 26.7 28.1
100.0


Total 564 94.8 100.0



Missing System 31 5.2



Total 595 100.0






regvotex

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 0 66 11.1 11.3 11.3

1 518 87.2 88.7 100.0

Total 584 98.3 100.0

Missing System 10 1.7

Total 595 100.0




whovotex

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 0 108 18.1 19.9 19.9

1 433 72.8 80.1 100.0

Total 541 90.9 100.0

Missing System 54 9.1

Total 595 100.0




edlettex

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 0 487 81.9 83.7 83.7

1 95 15.9 16.3 100.0

Total 582 97.8 100.0

Missing System 13 2.2

Total 595 100.0




calledx

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 0 494 83.0 84.7 84.7

1 89 14.9 15.3 100.0

Total 583 98.0 100.0

Missing System 12 2.0

Total 595 100.0




contcanx

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 0 379 63.7 65.1 65.1

1 203 34.1 34.9 100.0

Total 581 97.7 100.0

Missing System 14 2.3

Total 595 100.0




gomeetx

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 0 388 65.3 66.9 66.9

1 192 32.3 33.1 100.0

Total 580 97.5 100.0

Missing System 15 2.5

Total 595 100.0




talkmeex

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 0 477 80.2 82.3 82.3

1 103 17.3 17.7 100.0

Total 580 97.5 100.0

Missing System 15 2.5

Total 595 100.0




protestx

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 0 525 88.3 90.5 90.5

1 55 9.2 9.5 100.0

Total 580 97.5 100.0

Missing System 15 2.5

Total 595 100.0




workcamx

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 0 514 86.5 88.3 88.3

1 68 11.5 11.7 100.0

Total 583 98.0 100.0

Missing System 12 2.0

Total 595 100.0




tennmood Index of governor approval, tenn direction and tenn econ

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 0 47 8.0 24.4 24.4

33.33333333333333 62 10.5 32.1 56.5

66.66666666666666 62 10.5 32.2 88.7

100 22 3.7 11.3 100.0

Total 194 32.6 100.0

Missing System 401 67.4

Total 595 100.0




natmood Index of prez approval, national direction and national econ

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 0 70 11.7 34.3 34.3

33.33333333333333 99 16.7 48.9 83.3

66.66666666666666 33 5.5 16.1 99.4

100 1 .2 .6 100.0

Total 203 34.2 100.0

Missing System 392 65.8

Total 595 100.0




npdays How often read paper

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 0 zero days 126 21.1 21.9 21.9

1 1 day 52 8.7 9.0 30.8

2 2 days 62 10.4 10.8 41.6

3 3 days 35 5.9 6.1 47.7

4 4 days 24 4.1 4.2 52.0

5 5 days 43 7.3 7.5 59.5

6 6 days 12 2.0 2.1 61.6

7 7 days 221 37.1 38.4 100.0

Total 575 96.6 100.0

Missing 27 Refused 1 .1

33 Dont' know 18 3.1

System 1 .2

Total 20 3.4

Total 595 100.0




tvndays How often watch tv newscast

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 0 zero days 40 6.7 6.8 6.8

1 1 day 18 3.1 3.1 9.9

2 2 days 38 6.3 6.5 16.4

3 3 days 28 4.7 4.8 21.1

4 4 days 16 2.8 2.8 24.0

5 5 days 25 4.3 4.4 28.3

6 6 days 9 1.6 1.6 29.9

7 7 days 409 68.8 70.1 100.0

Total 584 98.2 100.0

Missing 33 Dont' know 9 1.4

System 2 .3

Total 11 1.8

Total 595 100.0




netuse Time spent using the Internet

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 More than an hour a day 240 40.4 40.6 40.6

2 Up to one hour a day 113 19.0 19.0 59.7

3 A few times a week 86 14.5 14.6 74.3

4 A few times a month of less 28 4.8 4.8 79.1

5 Never 121 20.3 20.4 99.5

33 Don't know 3 .5 .5 100.0

Total 592 99.5 100.0

Missing System 3 .5

Total 595 100.0




libcon Liberal or conservative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Far left 13 2.3 2.3 2.3

2 Liberal 91 15.4 15.4 17.7

3 Middle of road 196 33.0 33.1 50.8

4 Conservative 212 35.6 35.8 86.6

5 Far right 22 3.8 3.8 90.4

27 Refused 7 1.1 1.1 91.6

33 Don't know 50 8.4 8.4 100.0

Total 592 99.5 100.0

Missing System 3 .5

Total 595 100.0




regvote Registered to vote?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Yes 518 87.2 88.0 88.0

2 No 66 11.1 11.2 99.3

27 Refused 1 .2 .2 99.4

33 Don't know 3 .6 .6 100.0

Total 589 99.0 100.0

Missing System 6 1.0

Total 595 100.0




oftchrch How often do you go to church?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Never 75 12.7 13.5 13.5

2 Seldom 132 22.3 23.8 37.3

3 Once a month 53 8.9 9.5 46.8

4 Almost every week 116 19.5 20.8 67.6

5 Once a week 181 30.4 32.4 100.0

Total 557 93.7 100.0

Missing 27 Refused 6 1.0

33 Don't know 8 1.3

System 24 4.0

Total 37 6.3

Total 595 100.0




hispanic Are you hispanic?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Yes 17 2.8 3.0 3.0

2 No 535 89.9 94.7 97.7

27 Refused 3 .4 .5 98.1

33 Don't know 11 1.8 1.9 100.0

Total 565 95.0 100.0

Missing System 30 5.0

Total 595 100.0




agecat Age category

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1.00 18-34 165 27.7 29.8 29.8

2.00 35-49 159 26.8 28.8 58.5

3.00 50-64 135 22.8 24.4 83.0

4.00 65 or older 94 15.8 17.0 100.0

Total 554 93.1 100.0

Missing 99 41 6.9

Total 595 100.0




incat Income category

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1.00 Less than 15K 66 11.1 14.6 14.6

2.00 15-25K 47 8.0 10.5 25.1

3.00 25-40K 78 13.2 17.3 42.4

4.00 40-50K 50 8.5 11.2 53.6

5.00 More than 50K 210 35.2 46.4 100.0

Total 451 75.9 100.0

Missing System 143 24.1

Total 595 100.0




intdate INTDATE

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 20090216 83 13.9 14.6 14.6

20090217 58 9.8 10.3 24.9

20090219 58 9.8 10.3 35.3

20090220 95 16.0 16.9 52.2

20090221 24 4.1 4.3 56.5

20090223 45 7.5 7.9 64.4

20090224 47 8.0 8.4 72.8

20090226 63 10.6 11.2 84.0

20090227 68 11.4 12.0 96.0

20090228 22 3.8 4.0 100.0

Total 564 94.8 100.0

Missing System 31 5.2

Total 595 100.0




racecat Race category

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1.00 White 464 78.0 84.7 84.7

2.00 Black 57 9.5 10.4 95.1

3.00 other 27 4.5 4.9 100.0

Total 548 92.1 100.0

Missing 99 47 7.9

Total 595 100.0




edcat Education category

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1.00 H.S. Grad. or less 235 39.5 42.1 42.1

2.00 Some College or Trade 123 20.8 22.1 64.3

3.00 College Grad. to Post Grad 199 33.5 35.7 100.0

Total 558 93.8 100.0

Missing System 37 6.2

Total 595 100.0




metrona Metro Nashville non-Metro dichotomy


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent


Valid .00 Non-Metro Nash/Davidson 492 82.8 87.2 87.2



1.00 Metro Nashville-Davidson Co 72 12.2 12.8 100.0



Total 565 95.0 100.0



Missing System 30 5.0



Total 595 100.0






REGION Tennessee region


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent


Valid 1.00 Metro Nashville 72 12.2 12.2 12.2



2.00 Middle Tennessee, Doughnut 100 16.8 16.8 29.0



3.00 Middle Tennessee, Non-Doughnut 90 15.2 15.2 44.2



4.00 Non-Middle Tennessee 332 55.8 55.8 100.0



Total 595 100.0 100.0






division Grand division: East Middle West

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1.00 East 219 36.8 38.8 38.8

2.00 Middle 242 40.7 42.9 81.7

3.00 West 103 17.3 18.3 100.0

Total 564 94.8 100.0

Missing System 31 5.2

Total 595 100.0




faithcat Faith category

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1.00 Southern Baptist 44 7.4 7.6 7.6

2.00 Other Baptist 93 15.6 16.0 23.6

3.00 United Methodist 38 6.3 6.5 30.1

4.00 Churches of Christ 24 4.0 4.1 34.2

5.00 Catholic 30 5.0 5.1 39.3

6.00 Christian Churches 20 3.4 3.5 42.8

98.00 Other mainline 23 3.9 4.0 46.8

99.00 Other Protestant 64 10.8 11.0 57.8

999.00 Unchurched 245 41.2 42.2 100.0

Total 581 97.7 100.0

Missing 27.00 Refused 5 .8

33.00 Don't know 2 .4

System 6 1.1

Total 13 2.3

Total 595 100.0




PARTYAFF PARTY AFFILIATION

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid .00 Strong Democrat 124 20.8 21.3 21.3

1.00 Moderate Democrat 63 10.6 10.9 32.2

2.00 Lean Democrat 48 8.0 8.3 40.5

3.00 Independent no lean 124 20.8 21.3 61.8

4.00 Lean Republican 37 6.3 6.4 68.3

5.00 Moderate Republican 86 14.5 14.8 83.1

6.00 Strong Republican 98 16.5 16.9 100.0

Total 579 97.4 100.0

Missing 99 16 2.6

Total 595 100.0




evanindx Evangelicalism index

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 0 82 13.8 15.2 15.2

1 83 13.9 15.3 30.5

2 87 14.6 16.1 46.7

3 158 26.6 29.3 76.0

4 130 21.8 24.0 100.0

Total 540 90.8 100.0

Missing System 55 9.2

Total 595 100.0




gender Male or female

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 Male 282 47.4 50.0 50.0

2 Female 282 47.4 50.0 100.0

Total 564 94.8 100.0

Missing 99 31 5.2

Total 595 100.0




dkk Political knowledge index (max=5)

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 0 58 9.8 9.8 9.8

1 51 8.6 8.6 18.4

2 83 14.0 14.0 32.4

3 110 18.6 18.6 51.0

4 127 21.3 21.3 72.3

5 165 27.7 27.7 100.0

Total 595 100.0 100.0